Tying the Knot with Your Tenant?
“What the true proverb says has happened to them: ‘The dog returns to its own vomit, and the sow, after washing herself, returns to wallow in the mire.’”
(2 Peter 2:22)
“Winning is not a sometime thing; it’s an all the time thing. You don’t win once in a while; you don’t do things right once in a while; you do them right all of the time. Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing.”
(Vince Lombardi)
“Frustration is a function of our expectations.”
(Stephen Covey)
Relationships can be a funny thing. I remember hearing some version of this soliloquy about a friend’s boyfriend years ago:
“John” can be a really sweet guy and make me laugh! He brings me to cool places and, at times, makes me feel like the most special girl in the world. He is ruggedly handsome and is a really good athlete. He seems to be a big animal lover and is loving on his dog constantly (which is really cute!!). He sees us being together forever.
But… he can also be really cold. He can’t keep down a job and would get really angry at his co-workers and bosses in the past few places he’s worked. He is really unpunctual and forgets about me when he’s around his guy friends. His family has largely alienated him and I’m not sure he cares about anyone but himself (and his dog).
He asked me to marry him and I said “yes!”
Wait- what?? Congratulations???
We have a version of this courtship in Charlotte property management with lease renewals.
A tenant and landlord signing their first lease could be viewed like a couple dating. The tenant can see how the landlord treats them, how quickly inquiries are responded to, and if their business is handled competently. On the other side, landlords can see if the tenant pays on time, follows the rules of the lease, and cares for the house. It’s a two-way street.
When the first lease is near its expiration date, both sides have a decision to make on whether to keep the lease going. Do they like each other? Is the price right? Does renting this home for another year sound appealing?
With a renewed lease, most things for the next year would probably be the same. Any large behavioral change from either party would not be expected; even when people promise they will change some behavior, they tend to regress back to the mean at some point. What happens during the first year of the lease is going to be close to what is happening during the second, third, or tenth year of the lease. From a landlord perspective, the question to ask is whether the status quo is acceptable.
If tenants pay late in 6 of the 12 months in the first year, the chances are they will be late as often in the new lease. If the tenants are trashing the house in the first year, they are probably not practicing good housekeeping in the second. Fortunately, the inverses are also true.
Renewing the lease and keeping a tenant is much cheaper and easier than fixing up a house and finding another. But having peace with a rental home should not be minimized. If late payments or communication issues cause landlords consistent unrest and anger, a lease should not be renewed; it’s not worth it. However, if the business decision is made to renew a lease to a tenant who is not fully meeting the lease standards, expectations of future performance should be recalibrated. The correct expectation should be more of the same.
Much like tying the knot with “John” after knowing his flaws, lease renewal decisions should be made in light of the respective tenant’s known behavior. Everyone wants positive change, but it can’t be relied on. Smart landlords become fully aware of who they are tying the knot with before signing on to extend their lease for another year!
Happy Landlording!
Learn More
Charlotte Property Management Weekly: Are Monthly Rental Home Inspections Desirable?
I was asked recently if our property management company provided monthly rental home inspections for houses under management. I assume what was meant was the kind of inspection where we go into the property, check everything out, eat dinner with the tenants, and then help any young children with their homework. Then we’d set a time to visit again the next month before hugging goodbye. Smiles would be all around.
This type of inspection would work if we were renting out the “Little House on the Prairie” and the harvest was plentiful that fall. But I’m not even sure how welcome we’d be if the rain wasn’t coming and Pa had to sell one of their prized cows to make ends meet. And I’m not sure how happy they would be to have another mouth to feed when we stopped by for our monthly inspection; we’d, of course, be slightly embarrassed that dinner conversation would focus on the eviction our clients, the Olsen’s, are ordering us to execute on them (“If rent isn’t paid, file for eviction on the Ingalls’s promptly on the 11th! No more famine excuses!”).
Unfortunately (and fortunately), modern life isn’t like this anymore. Tenants don’t want the property manager coming around; they’re busy and don’t want their property managers tied into their social life (usually).
However, rental home inspections are sometimes necessary. But how often should they be conducted? Let’s examine the pros and cons of a monthly visit:
Pros of monthly inspections:
1. Knowing what the tenants are up to
2. Lease violations would be quickly recognized and dealt with
Cons of monthly inspections:
1. Become a preferred rental vendor of the old KGB and Gestapo
2. Limited benefit for costs associated with frequent visits
3. Tenants will be hateful and not rent from you
4. Pushback from tenant privacy issues
5. Forced to deal with issues that arise- do you evict? Tough decisions and ultimatums have to be handed down, and then they need to be carried out.
More on #5. The “sometimes ignorance is bliss” is a tough one to explain. “I always want to know what is going on in my rental house!” Do you?
If violations are found, are you ready to evict? If the tenant is paying on time and in full every month, do you want your property manager looking for reasons to get rid of the tenants? Eviction is expensive! And when the tenants are being evicted, no one is paying the rent anymore. That’s a double whammy on costs.
Well, warnings could be issued. “If this happens one more time, then you’re out!” If there is evidence that it did happen the following month, you really do have to evict them now. If not, what is the purpose of these monthly inspections anyway? Inspections are not meant to paint the owners into a corner. At the end of the day, you want paying tenants to stay, right?
Inspections can be useful; some violations need to be dealt with immediately. However, even the Ingalls’s wouldn’t think it was rude if you stopped by on a much less regular basis!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Rental Homes Don’t Need to “Dress” Well?
Everyone knows that for a home to sell (especially in a challenging economy) it needs to look its best. Now does that logic apply to rental homes in terms of leasing them out?
Not from what property managers sometimes hear from rental home owners:
“It looks fine. It’s just a rental.”
“I’d live here with the place looking ‘as-is.’ I don’t think I’d want a prissy renter who couldn’t deal with a few minor issues and a little dirt.”
“The other property manager down the street said it was fine the way it was. You want me to spend how much to fix it up?”
I’ve heard the analogy that a house should “dress” like it’s dating when it’s on the market for sale, and “dress” like it’s married when on the rental market. I’m not sure if I’m more bothered by:
1. The connotation that spouses don’t try to look their best for each other once they are married
OR
2. That property managers have to resort to relationship analogies to get people to actually listen to them
That being said, I think there is a semblance of truth to the fact that homes for sale need to “dress” better than homes for rent.
But… there is a direct cost to this! And this is when “monthly rent versus value” arguments start. Let me explain.
When we are assessing what a rental house can rent for, we provide a range of rental prices (example: “Your house should rent in the “$1,100 – $1,300 a month range.”). We ask the owner to pick the price they want to rent it for. Well, duh! Everyone (except the morons) would pick the $1,300!
Well, after further thought, maybe not. There are drawbacks to marketing at the highest rental price when the rental house doesn’t match up to competing homes; drawbacks like the house staying vacant for a long, long time!
In order to command top rental dollar, the rental home needs to:
1. Have minimal flaws and look really good
2. Offer equal or more tangible value than similarly priced rental homes
So, if owners don’t want to spend the funds to have the house look immaculate and the house is not the same or a better value than similar rental homes, they may want to list it at a lower price (like $1,150). This will ultimately offer a better ROI as they won’t have to eat their mortgage payment and expenses for the many months it might take to rent it out (this happens when price is not correlated well with market value).
Unfortunately, the market doesn’t lie. With the internet, prospective tenants can find hundreds of rental homes that are all competing to get their attention and money. The market is efficient; rental homes that offer good value will get quickly snapped up, and the ones that don’t will sit.
The way a home looks is the most important criteria in how much a renter will pay each month in rent. If the home has “some minor issues and a little dirt”, there is value lost when compared to a fully functional, clean rental. The rental rate needs to be adjusted downward or the home will sit empty for months and months.
The bottom line is that good-looking homes offer more value, which will command a higher rental rate, and be vacant for less time. This generates more money for the owner. The converse is equally true. So “dressing” does make a difference!
Wait- it’s also true that a well-dressed person who looks their best at all times will generate more, and better-heeled, suitors…
Maybe there is something to this “dressing” relationship analogy after all?
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Money Back Guarantee on Rental Homes?
A fact of life is that sometimes people are not happy with what they buy. Sometimes they buy fruit and it is not as sweet as they like. They buy bread and it is not fresh enough. They buy Charlotte Bobcats basketball tickets (prior to them trading away their best player for basically nothing) and the team is not good enough.
And so it occasionally goes for rental homes. People sign a lease, move in, and then decide that they do not want to stay there for a myriad of reasons. As a result, property managers sometimes receive e-mails like this:
Dear Sir/Madam,
We were excited about moving into this home but it is a complete disaster! We visited the property during the day prior to signing the lease and everything looked great. Little did we know that the next door neighbor slept during the day, and only did his animal sacrificing in the dead of the night! The screeching animals prevent us from getting any sleep and my 9-year old daughter is so traumatized she won’t even look at animal crackers anymore! We’ve had to take down our bird feeder to keep the neighbor from hopping the fence and our beloved outdoor cat has been relegated to an upstairs, windowless room. Help!
We need to get out of our lease immediately and are demanding reimbursement for all moving expenses, therapy sessions, and a pet security detail during the move.
Signed-
Moving Now (Unhappily)
P.S. We hate you.
No one likes getting letters like this. Believe it or not, property managers want tenants to be happy, almost as much as the tenants do; so do the owners of the rental homes (without exception in my experience)! It makes the job of securing payment from the tenant (and consequently paying the owner) a lot easier! No non-masochist property manager is trying to pull a bait and switch on anyone; I mean, guess who would be fielding unhappy calls daily for the life of the lease? It would not be worth it!
That being said, I believe that the right rental home exists for the right person. There is not a one-size fits-all rental home in existence. This truth is why tenants need to visit the property, talk to neighbors, and develop a comfort level with the home prior to signing a long term lease!
So back to the facts of the example situation: The property manager works for the owner of the property. The tenant wants out of the home. The owner needs to make a decision on what they want (or can afford) to do.
Let’s look at the money back guarantee possibility from the one who has to pay for everything (the owner). If the tenant is allowed to move out and is reimbursed expenses, the costs that will accrue to the owner are as follows (note: some costs are one-time and others are on-going):
1. Reimbursement of tenant moving expenses and miscellaneous
2. Turning and keeping on utilities
3. Monthly mortgage payment and HOA fees while rental is not under contract
4. Cleaning & repair
5. Preparing marketing materials (pictures, ad copy, and home information)
6. Advertising costs
7. Property management fees (Yes, sorry. The non-profit property management companies (aka www.PropertyManagerInYourState.org)) don’t seem to last.
8. Real estate agent commissions for bringing in the tenant
9. Monthly mortgage payment and HOA fees while under contract (the time the house is taken off of the market and the tenant is ready to move in- someone has to pay for this time…)
This turns out to be a lot of money! This is why money back guarantees on rentals are not financially viable!
At the end of the day, it’s not a good situation for anyone. The owner and tenant both feel they are getting bilked. So what to do?
The best solution is avoidance! Property managers and owners should represent the property as accurately and completely as possible. Tenants should go in expecting that they will be living in the rental for the life of their lease and should perform extensive due diligence accordingly.
Then, even without a money back guarantee, property managers can start getting letters with the postscript of “I love you” a little bit more!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
