Charlotte Property Management Weekly: Groupons & Free Property Management
I’m a big (recent) fan of these “Groupons.” What a great deal for consumers! Groupons are like regular coupons, except on steroids; they offer discounts of 50%+ to use at local businesses. I am impressed and now a big supporter.
Early last week there was a groupon for one of the top restaurants in Charlotte offering $60 worth of food for $25. What a great deal! I bought one and used it the next night. It was as advertised; we ordered the food, got the check, and gave them the groupon coupon (I’m a poet and don’t even know it). They took $60 off the bill and we left without any police following.
As a consumer, I was pleased. Make that very, very pleased. However, as a business owner, my stomach turned. Why would this great restaurant agree to take such a huge price concession? Are these the type of patrons they want to attract? Why are they trying to compete on price? That’s for McDonalds and Wendy’s, for crying out loud!
I always came from the school of marketing that believed that business differentiation is achieved on 3 playing fields: quality, customer service, and price. As a business, you pick the two you want to be good at. Most (sustainable) businesses are very good at one, few are very good at two, and none are very good at three. It’s impossible to do; I challenge you to name one business that competes at all 3 (customer service, quality, and price) very well. This is what this great restaurant was trying to do (albeit it was a promotion and not normal business operations)!
I’ve seen a similar promotional tool offering months of free property management for new customers. I can certainly understand the logic as we (supposively) are in a “new normal” that everyone is talking about. Customers are price conscious and free is always better than paying, right? So most customers will gravitate towards this type of deal; it’s just like the groupon I loved, right? Or is it different?
I would argue that good property management is much different than having a meal in a nice restaurant. Sure, discounts on both are nice. But you can eat at a restaurant and leave after paying for the meal, no strings are attached. The restaurant knows that you will only come back (and pay their regular prices!) if you really enjoyed their food, staff, and overall experience. If there is some bite-back of any kind (aka food poisoning), you would never come back.
However, with free property management, you are signing a minimum of a one-year contract. You are like the Huey Lewis song, “Happy to be stuck with you.” But it’s fine because you’re not paying anything, right? Well, that’s true for the first few months anyway. Or is it? What about if the property management company does something that costs you a bunch of money, like places a destructive, non-paying tenant into your home? Then the few hundred dollars of savings from “free” property management won’t be so free. Costs of eviction, non-payment, and fix-up can really add up!
The point is that if the property management company you are looking into is offering you months of free property management (or other “groupon-like” discounts), you may want to look at what that means to their quality and customer service. No company is good at all three, and quality and customer service cost money to implement and execute! Good people are not cheap! And relationships bought cheaply are usually just that.
Saving money is great on one-time deals, like buying a great, name-brand shirt or an expensive meal from a great restaurant! But be wary when saving a few bucks initially means entering into a long-term, contractual relationship!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Charlotte Headlines Say Real Estate Market is on Rebound? Or Not?
“There are no facts, just interpretations.” Friedrich Nietzsche
On a whole, I like honesty. I like it when people tell me what they really think (within reason). And if they don’t have anything interesting or worthwhile to say, omission works well for me too. I like things clear and easily understood.
So it came to my chagrin when I was reading a headline of an article this week that blared, “N.C. foreclosure sales drop 42%.” Wow!! 42%? That’s almost half! Is the job market trending up in our southern paradise? 2011 must be when the US economy really rebounds led by the Tarheels of North Carolina! Charlotte is ready to do its part! This must mean that home price stabilization is around the corner and real estate will start picking up and lead our country to another streak of prosperity!
But wait… I really hadn’t heard anything about the local real estate market getting noticeably better; rather I’ve continued to hear the opposite. Homes sales in Charlotte have continued to dwindle (I read another headline saying that Charlotte home closings were down 23% in 10/10 when compared to 10/09!). Well, I guess that has nothing to do with people actually staying in their homes. So less foreclosed homes equals better capitalized consumers, which equals more consumers with jobs, which equals a better economy, which equals a more robust (and rising!) real estate market? Cool!
And then I actually read the article. The 42% foreclosure decrease was due to the halting of foreclosures due to questionable bank procedures. That explains it! So, this statistic is artificial and misleading. We’ll soon see a headline in the coming months saying that foreclosures are up 42%+ to make up for the halted foreclosures now.
And now that I think about it, our firm did have some closings that were held up because of this foreclosure freeze. So what does that mean about the 23% decline in home sale closings statistic compiled from 10/10 (when compared to 10/09)? Does that make that statistic artificial and misleading as well?
The clearest answer is “yeah, probably.” Who can figure out what’s going on? Maybe this is what Wall Street legend, Peter Lynch, was talking about when he said, “The man who studies macroeconomics for 15 minutes a year wastes 10 minutes.” There are too many moving parts to get a true picture of reality!
It’s like the rock band that labors through the reading of their 2,000 word concert review in Rolling Stone magazine and only wants to know one thing: “Do they think we rock?” I just want the same type of clarity from the headlines I read.
Are things getting better or worse?
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Pricing Rental Homes- List Above, At, or Below Market Value?
I have to admit, pricing rental homes is an issue that I struggle with. As a property manager in Charlotte for the past 6 years, I really should have a good grip on the right approach; however, I’m still constantly debating myself over the correct way to do it. And my therapist says this self-banter does not mean that I’m crazy.
So… it is safe to say that pricing is an inexact science. It is simply impossible to know what the optimal dollar figure is for any product or service. For example, let’s say you are a manager at The Gap (with the traditional logo intact). You put 5 sweaters on the rack for sale at $50 each. It takes 5 days and they all sell. Is this good? Was $50 the optimal price?
You’ll never know! Maybe you could have priced them at $55 each and still sold them in 5 days. Then you would have really screwed up; retail has been a tough field to be in for the past few years and the extra $25 in profit would have really helped The Gap’s stock price! Or maybe the sweaters should have been priced at $45 and they would have sold in 1 day. In this scenario, the lower profit would have been offset by the larger saving in inventory costs. But then again, who knows? Maybe at $45 each, customers would have perceived the sweater’s quality to be less and they would’ve taken 10 days to sell. It’s tough to figure out!
With rental homes, the confusion is similar. Below are the 3 pricing options available to every property owner:
1. Price Above Market Value: This is good if prospects will actually visit the rental; they may just look at the other rentals listed at or below market value. However, if the prospect visits and says they will take the place if the rent is knocked down a bit, that’s fine! The price can still be at or slightly above market value and the prospect is ecstatic they can tell their friends that they got a great deal.
2. Price at Market Value: An average amount of prospects will visit the rental and someone will take it in due time. The only issue is if the prospect says they will only rent the home if $100 is taken off of the monthly rent amount. Now the owner must decide if they want to lock into a below-market rate for a year, or roll the dice and wait for another qualified prospect. (Note: Rent negotiators usually turn out to be good renters. Unqualified or barely qualified prospects rarely try to negotiate the rental price. That takes chutzpah! It’s like getting into a bar at age 17 and arguing over the prices of shots.)
3. Price Below Market Value: Prospects will flock to the house and applications should roll in. Some people will still try to negotiate rent, but being that so many people are interested, these requests can be quickly (and justifiably) rebuffed. Locking into below market rates isn’t great in terms of ROI, but does provide the piece of mind of an occupied property with a good tenant (you can be choosy!).
So what’s the right answer? It depends. I know that’s not an overly helpful answer, but I’m not trying to be evasive. There are many factors that need to be considered besides the obvious ones (risk tolerance and financial wherewithal of the owner). Here are a few to ponder:
- If the property is 1 of 15 rentals in a neighborhood, pricing below market value could be a good point of differentiation. Conversely, if the rental is the only one in the neighborhood, it may be wise to price above market value.
- If it is probable that a real estate agent will bring a tenant in on a property, the pricing should be above market value. The reason? They will probably look to negotiate the rent down. If the tenant will probably come in from an ad, pricing at or below market value is probably the best strategy because they will be focused on the list price.
- If a downturn of activity is expected because of seasonality (like the Thanksgiving holiday through New Years), it would probably be smart to price below market value for the first few weeks of November. Having an empty house in November and December is going to kill the ROI; a rental reduction upfront in November will definitely have a better total net return than a month or two of extra vacancy.
So the moral is that pricing rental homes ain’t easy. Different times and situations call for different strategies. One size rarely fits all!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn More
Charlotte Property Management Weekly: Your Rental Home Wants You to Wait Until It’s Ready
Every client we’ve ever had has wanted as little vacancy time for their rental as possible. Zero days are optimal; every day after zero winds up costing them money in utilities, mortgage payments, and maintenance. Not wanting to lose any money leads to a mentality of getting the home on the market as soon as possible, regardless of condition and resident situation.
So some clients want us to put their homes on the market prior to them being ready for occupancy. What I mean by this is that the home has not been completely repaired and there are still personal items in the house. They (or their current tenants) also are within the process of moving.
The rationale, by itself, is sound. The greater the length of time the house is on the market, the greater amount of potential tenants that can see it. If more potential renters see it, the law of large numbers would dictate that someone at some point would love it and want it.
However, does this really work? I would argue it doesn’t. Huh? Why’s that? Isn’t it common sense?
Simply, the American consumer’s mind works differently now. There is an inundation of information being flung at them on a constant basis. Most of it is ignored; however, there are some marketing messages that get through (like a rental listing). If the consumer takes the time and makes an inquiry to visit the property, there is typically one shot to get them. Their attention span is limited.
This one shot means that the house has to look perfect. This visit needs to conclude with the prospective tenant loving the house. If they see or feel something they don’t like, it will probably turn them off and they will want to find another home. And there are many other rental houses on the market that look very similar. The competition is fierce!
So why does this matter? Maybe the diamonds in the rough that aren’t turned off by the home’s uncleanliness will be unearthed and they’ll take it. It’s certainly possible. But are renters who don’t care about the condition of the home desirable? If so, there may be disappointment when move-out time arrives and the home doesn’t look so great. Clean people typically want clean homes.
The other main reason is that once the marketing of the property begins, momentum is started. The rental is on the top of all the searches from rental websites, people who are waiting for a rental are told about it by their property managers, and it is fresh. This is when things typically happen for an average rental home- the first two weeks. Interested calls, inquiring e-mails, and subsequent showings come quickly. They need to be harnessed and converted into applications and security deposits.
But when the rental house isn’t up to the task, momentum is stunted. Interested, potential renters see the property in less than ideal shape and compare it to better kept homes on the market. The home loses out. Or the current tenant in the home is packing boxes to move and glares at the renter who is interrupting their evening after work. The house looks horrible and the vibe is bad. Potential renters flee to the next home. Can you blame them?
With rental homes, it’s more about quality time on the market and less about total time. Make sure the rental home is ready and most inviting when the most people want to look at it!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn More
Charlotte Property Management Weekly: 3 Approaches to Fixing Up a Rental Home
We sometimes take over management of homes that have been treated in, diplomatically-speaking, less than desired regard. It’s frustrating for the owners (and the property management company), especially in difficult economic times when cash is scarce.
The purpose of this article is not to talk about the root cause of this destruction (usually poor tenant screening), but rather the options available when faced with a rental home in bad shape.
It comes down to 3 potential approaches:
- Total Fix-Up: This is when everything is fixed so the home is in tip-top shape. New carpet, new paint, new everything! The upside to this approach is that the home will command top rent and a top tenant, while the downside is that it will demand top dollar to be spent by the owner. ROI on a 1-year rental with this approach is debatable.
- Partial Fix-Up: This is when the most pressing demands of the house are met. The house is cleaned well, the walls are touched up with paint, and the carpet is steam-cleaned. The goal is to make the house look like a good rental, not a show home. The upside to this approach is that it is much less expensive and will entice a good renter, while the downside is that it will not command top rent and the tenant will usually not be a neat-freak (we love neat freaks!!).
- No Fix-Up: This is when the home goes to market “as is.” Little to nothing is done to fix the home aesthetically and the tenant is asked to “have an open mind” and the property is listed as a “handyman’s special.” The upside to this approach is that repair costs are low and the home can be put on the market immediately. The downside is tough. Rents have to be lowered considerably, the quality of tenant suffers, and the house will be in even worse shape (think catastrophic) when the tenant moves out (evicted or otherwise).
So which is the best approach? The answer is the universal response in business school to any question- “it depends.” At different times and situations, each approach is appropriate. Many times this answer is dictated by finances. I mean, if you have no extra money, you are forced to use approach #3, right? And if your rental home has gotten to the point that it is absolutely disgusting, you probably have to opt for approach #1 at some point.
Generally-speaking, I’m a fan of approach #2. I try to stretch #2 as long as possible before I’m faced with the decision that the house has to go to approach #1 (or #3). Once I’m at that point, my preference is approach #1 (if finances allow).
The approach chosen for home fix-ups is a huge component on their ROI. One size does not fit all (as some are wont to do). Choose carefully (and profitably!)!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn More
Charlotte Property Management Weekly: $200 Rental Application Fees- Genius?
I don’t find myself being amazed at things very often, but I have to admit I was taken aback when I saw a large property management firm change their application fee from $25 to $200.
My initial thoughts were, “who is willing to pay that?” and “how can I justify charging that much for a rental application fee?”
I don’t know why they changed their rental application fee, but I have a guess- they got way too many applications from candidates who would never qualify to rent! Their people were inundated! So they used common sense.
In general, if a company wants less people to apply, then all they have to do is raise their application price. Corporations in every industry do something like this to control demand. If they want to sell less sweaters ($50 retail), then they raise the price to $100. If they want to sell more, they lower the price to $25. Simple.
But a smaller number of applicants equal less people who may rent the house. That’s bad! Maybe… But what if the tenants are screening themselves so that the non-qualifiers don’t even bother applying? If the probable non-qualifiers know they are borderline applicants, they still may be willing to gamble away $25 on an application fee. But $200? Not very likely!
Another thing I liked is that the property management firm refunds the $200 application fee if the tenant is approved. Now, good applicants know there is no risk to applying at $200 a pop. This property management firm is using price to lower the amount of resources needed to screen applicants (by lowering the number of applicants themselves!). They are also freeing their people up to work on higher margin activity (like filling the rental properties with their smaller, but better, applicant pool).
What’s not to like? Should every firm go to $200 per rental application?
As I racked my brain to figure out why I shouldn’t raise our rental application fee to $200, I came up with several reasons:
- Applicants who don’t qualify will get really angry; not $25 loss angry, but $200 loss angry (which could equal the money earned in several days of work). This can really stress out employees and make it so they want to work for someone who has $25 application fees and not get screamed at everyday.
- Employees would need to be prepared to be doggedly challenged on turned-down applications. That means the tenant screening process would need to be super- tight and really easy to explain. This would also remove some (in my opinion) much needed subjectivity in the application screening process.
- The main objective of changing the application price is to save time. Unfortunately, almost every person that calls is new to the firm. That means the $200 rental application fee will have to be explained in every phone call! I’m getting a headache just writing that.
I still think it’s a great idea; I’m curious to see how it will work in practice. I’m still a middle-of-the-road $75 rental application fee believer, but am ready to be convinced otherwise!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn More
Charlotte Property Management Weekly: Are You Practicing Insanity with your Home for Sale?
The definition of insanity is to do the same things over and over again and expect a different result. Is this what is happening with all the vacant homes still being listed for sale (that shouldn’t be)?
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: What’s the Difference Between “Rent-To-Own” and “Rent-To-Sell”?
Another popular question I hear from prospective clients is:
PC: “What’s the difference between rent-to-own and rent-to-sell?”
Us: “There is none!”
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Better to Rent or List Your Home for Sale? 3 Question Litmus Test
This seems to be a FAQ these days. As a property manager in Charlotte, we get many calls from people asking themselves this question.
I didn’t think there was a one-size-fits-all answer to this, but I was corrected. It just seems to come down to who you ask.
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Importance of Getting Paid from Rentals in the Next 5 Years
According to an article in Barron’s this month, the future of the real estate market is in rentals for the next five years. Most real estate agents are hoping this news is akin to the Bush White House claiming the existence of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction (WMD); hopefully, it is just another example of faulty American intelligence.
Learn More