Do Your Rental Home Repair People Care? 2 Lessons Learned
“People don’t care how much you know until they know how much you care.”
Theodore Roosevelt
“We have met the enemy and he is us.”
Walt Kelly (Pogo)
When you’re in the property management business, many different things in houses will break. It’s a sad reality, but it is also the reality that keeps property managers in business (so we keep our complaints to a minimum!).
Contrary to popular thought in Charlotte, we really don’t know everything (please laugh!). So like most property management companies, we employ repair professionals to work on things that break (plumbing, roofs, appliances, HVAC, painting, etc.). They are, in effect, an extension of us at BDF Realty.
So how do we know if the repair people we use are any good? The simple answer is if things are fixed and tenants are not calling us to say their issue did not stay resolved. And if the issue recurs (which happens to the best of them), how does the repair person handle it? Do we get charged for another visit to the house? Do these recurring issues happen often? How long does it take for them to get back to do the repair again?
So skill-wise, we can figure out if a repair person is any good in a reasonable amount of time. Let’s call those the hard skills. But what about the soft skills? Are they kind? Conscientious?
Do they care?
That’s tougher. We can’t go on every service call with our repair people. And if they can’t at least fake being nice and caring during those calls, they weren’t going to last anyway. So how can you tell if they care?
I’ve learned 2 lessons over the years:
- If any tenants call to complain about a repair person, there is probably something wrong with the repair person. Two calls and there is definitely something wrong.
It takes time and effort to locate the property manager’s information, call them, and detail your experience without sounding like a whiner. Most tenants don’t care enough unless something is really off.
Several years ago, I used a really nice, reasonably priced handyman to work on many of our homes. When I would see him in person, he was sharp as a tack and would bend over backward to resolve issues. But I started getting a few tenant calls about chronic lateness and “shady” people he was bringing with him to work on jobs. We had to sever ties with him. He’s still a nice guy, but he just didn’t care enough to show up on time and be professional.
- If the repair person is treating us poorly, chances are they are doing the same to the tenants.
Recently, we had a repair person work on an issue at a vacant home for us. We gave him the lockbox code so he could get in and do the work. The next day we were at the property and found the house key in the lockbox, broken in half. We called the repair person and he said he had broken the key in the lock and forgotten to call us about it.
To me, that’s sort of a big deal, but not the key breaking per se. I will be the first to tell you that things happen. As Charles Swindoll said, “Life is 10% of what happens to me and 90% of how I react to it.” I’m not going to give someone a hard time over things breaking; truthfully the lock was tough and anyone could have broken a key in it. But not thinking it was important enough to let me know immediately about? I have to ask, “Does he care?”
Having repair people that care matters. Being a property manager who cares is important too. And the two are exactly the same to the tenants we serve.
Happy Landlording!
Brett Furniss is the head property manager of BDF Realty (Charlotte Residential Property Management), the trusted real estate advisor for Charlotte landlords & Home of $100 Flat Fee Property Management. BDF Realty utilizes their innovative Pod System for exceptional customer service in residential property management, home repairs, and home sales for single-family homes, Uptown condos, and town homes in the Charlotte-Metro Area. Contact Us Today!
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Why Rent-To-Sell is “Hot, Hot, Hot” in Today’s Cold Real Estate Market
Q: Why do robbers rob banks?
A: Because that’s where the money is
Q: Why have home sellers shifted their vacant homes from “for sale” to “rent-to-sell”?
A: Because that’s where the future buyers are
It’s really that simple. I probably sound like a broken record, but I still see vacant homes trying to sell for full market prices. And it’s just not working. Let me repeat: it’s just not working.
My old economics professor always said that the lottery was a tax for people who didn’t pay attention in math class. He meant that the odds of winning are so astronomical that buying a ticket is just a waste of money.
In a way, I feel the same about most vacant homes. Let’s look at the math:
Find the number of houses that sold in your region last year (let’s call this number “X”). Now compare X with what the home sales numbers were annually in the past 5 years. X is comparatively low. That is obviously not good news for home sellers. Unfortunately, home sales have trended downward (and are expected to continue to do so).
Now take X and cut it in half. What? Unfortunately, half of X is distressed home sales (foreclosure, REO, short sale, etc.). This “half of X” gives us the true number of people who are now shopping for your home (if it is listed for sale at close to full value). That’s not good.
So the math is basically saying that there are way fewer (way, way, way fewer!) home buyers out there for houses that are not distressed.
Note: For non-math majors (and lottery enthusiasts), you can also gather this information informally; just ask “How’s the sale process going?” to anyone who has their non-distressed home currently on the market for sale. They may respond with a half-laugh, menacing glance, or a choice word (not a nice one).
Then ask anyone who is trying to get a home loan the same question. You’ll probably get a similar response.
So many vacant homes are for sale. And many buyers can’t get a loan to buy your house. How could a win-win situation be created here?
This is why the rent-to-sell method of home selling is hot. Or, if you prefer to stick with the old song, rent-to-sell is “hot, hot, hot.”
How does rent-to-sell work? Buyers, who can’t qualify for a loan now, rent your home for 1-3 years until they qualify. Then they buy it at market price when the real estate market has rebounded. This solves the problem of home sellers eating the mortgage on a vacant home every month and buyers not having a place to call their own.
Rent-to-sell can be a great solution to escape the cold, expensive reality of a vacant home that isn’t selling!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Lessons Learned from Holding Expensive Rental Homes Way Too Long: Why 1 -5 Years is Ideal
I wanted to share a dilemma I’ve had with an expensive rental home I’ve kept. But before I start, a good place to begin is my overall philosophy on “expensive versus cheaper rental homes”:
Expensive rental homes are ideal and appreciate greatly (cha-ching!!) in rising real estate markets, yet are more expensive to maintain, cash flow every month, and pay the mortgage during vacancies. Cheaper rentals are the opposite; they don’t tend to go up in value much, but are much cheaper to fix up, maintain, and positive cash flow every month.
And without further ado, here’s my personal tale of dealing with my big, expensive rental home:
It is a really nice home! When the economy and real estate market were soaring, my paper net worth (cue laughter) was awesome! Comparable sales in the subdivision kept going up which made me look like a genius with my home investment (I bought a pre-foreclosure at a great discount).
As a property manager, I put this home up for rent-to-sell and rental to a number of tenants over the years. The cash flow more than covered the mortgage and I was pretty happy with myself. The tenants kept the home in relatively good condition so maintenance and upkeep was minimal. I was living the real estate high life as prices in the subdivision continued to go up, and up, and up!
However, there was always normal “wear and tear” on the property. And as the years rolled by and tenants moved-in and out, the minor damages started to add up. Then it came to a point when I realized that the home needed to be updated, as tenants and buyers started turning their noses at it when it went on the market. So I mentally knew it was probably time to pay the piper; unfortunately, the costs started disturbingly revealing themselves (new paint, new carpet, new appliances, etc.). For larger homes like this one, it became clear that real money ($10-$20K) would need to be expended. What wasn’t clear was where this money was supposed to come from.
In a down economy, the expensive home becomes a weight wrapped around your neck; it’s much like the old Mighty Mouse cartoons where every episode had someone (something?) locked in a weighted treasure, sinking to the bottom of the ocean (of financial ruin). It’s tough! The clear answer is to sell the home, but stomaching the “investment” of all of this money to fix it up, waiting months (minimum) before it is sold at a depressed price, while paying the (expensive) mortgage every month is certainly not ideal. It’s also a question of remaining solvent while this selling process drags on.
That’s life, right? Suck it up! But maybe there are some lessons to be learned from this experience when buying an expensive investment home:
- Always buy at a significant discount (preferably in a down economy, like now)
- Target to sell it in 1-5 years, or before a significant fix-up investment is required
- Selling it should be the ultimate, short-term goal. First, try to flip it if it is feasible. If it’s not, try the rent-to-sell method of selling (placing a rent-to-own tenant into the property who is targeted to buy it in 1-3 years); sell it to them, or put it on the market when they move out.
- Don’t be greedy. Making money instantly is better than losing money perpetually.
Buy low, sell high, and don’t get caught fixing up expensive homes! Keeping cheaper rental homes for long-term investments is less risky, less stressful, and easier on the wallet in the long-term; use expensive rentals for a short-term (1-5 years) bounce in income.
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: #1 Way to Fill Rental Homes Quickly
As homes for sale sit and rentals continue to gain prominence in the residential real estate market across the country, concerned owners are wondering how to best fill their rental properties quickly. So are property managers.
“Everyday my house is empty costs me money! Besides the mortgage payment, it’s the other things that are absolutely killing me- utilities with this unusually cold and snowy winter, HOA dues rising, you name it. I need someone renting (or buying) my home!” is a common lament from homeowners with a vacant home on the market.
As a real estate investor and property manager in Charlotte, I feel your pain. I don’t like vacancies anymore than you. But there is a simple way to make your home attractive. And it addresses the most heard complaint, by far, that I hear about houses and why prospective tenants pass on them. And just what is this revelatory nugget?
Cleanliness. That’s it. Houses are typically not clean. Actually, it’s not that they are not clean technically. It’s that they are not clean enough. Prospective tenants want to see sparkle. They want to see their unblemished reflections coming off of stainless steel. They want to be able to eat off the floors. They want to lap cool spring water out of the toilets (well, I may be pushing it now…). The point is that they really like the houses to be much cleaner than they would normally keep them.
Recently, we switched to a different cleaning service that was more expensive. I would never think of adding expenses to our owner clients (especially in this economy), but I felt that our homes were not standing out as the rental market continued to get more and more crowded.
And it worked. I noticed our rate of conversions of visits to completed applications went up dramatically. This has gone on for months. Thorough, deep-cleaning was more effective than lowering the rental price. This has been especially effective for our rent-to-sell program where people want to fall in love with the house they are potentially buying.
I would challenge you to give it a try. When a house has been on the market for a while and has been getting visits (but no completed applications), resist the urge to lower the price and just pay the dollars to give the rental home a thorough scrubbing (or do it yourself, though I recommend professionals). See if it works!
Cleanliness is next to godliness, the saying goes. Reap the benefits of a shorter courting period with prospective tenants!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Charlotte Headlines Say Real Estate Market is on Rebound? Or Not?
“There are no facts, just interpretations.” Friedrich Nietzsche
On a whole, I like honesty. I like it when people tell me what they really think (within reason). And if they don’t have anything interesting or worthwhile to say, omission works well for me too. I like things clear and easily understood.
So it came to my chagrin when I was reading a headline of an article this week that blared, “N.C. foreclosure sales drop 42%.” Wow!! 42%? That’s almost half! Is the job market trending up in our southern paradise? 2011 must be when the US economy really rebounds led by the Tarheels of North Carolina! Charlotte is ready to do its part! This must mean that home price stabilization is around the corner and real estate will start picking up and lead our country to another streak of prosperity!
But wait… I really hadn’t heard anything about the local real estate market getting noticeably better; rather I’ve continued to hear the opposite. Homes sales in Charlotte have continued to dwindle (I read another headline saying that Charlotte home closings were down 23% in 10/10 when compared to 10/09!). Well, I guess that has nothing to do with people actually staying in their homes. So less foreclosed homes equals better capitalized consumers, which equals more consumers with jobs, which equals a better economy, which equals a more robust (and rising!) real estate market? Cool!
And then I actually read the article. The 42% foreclosure decrease was due to the halting of foreclosures due to questionable bank procedures. That explains it! So, this statistic is artificial and misleading. We’ll soon see a headline in the coming months saying that foreclosures are up 42%+ to make up for the halted foreclosures now.
And now that I think about it, our firm did have some closings that were held up because of this foreclosure freeze. So what does that mean about the 23% decline in home sale closings statistic compiled from 10/10 (when compared to 10/09)? Does that make that statistic artificial and misleading as well?
The clearest answer is “yeah, probably.” Who can figure out what’s going on? Maybe this is what Wall Street legend, Peter Lynch, was talking about when he said, “The man who studies macroeconomics for 15 minutes a year wastes 10 minutes.” There are too many moving parts to get a true picture of reality!
It’s like the rock band that labors through the reading of their 2,000 word concert review in Rolling Stone magazine and only wants to know one thing: “Do they think we rock?” I just want the same type of clarity from the headlines I read.
Are things getting better or worse?
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Your Rental Home Wants You to Wait Until It’s Ready
Every client we’ve ever had has wanted as little vacancy time for their rental as possible. Zero days are optimal; every day after zero winds up costing them money in utilities, mortgage payments, and maintenance. Not wanting to lose any money leads to a mentality of getting the home on the market as soon as possible, regardless of condition and resident situation.
So some clients want us to put their homes on the market prior to them being ready for occupancy. What I mean by this is that the home has not been completely repaired and there are still personal items in the house. They (or their current tenants) also are within the process of moving.
The rationale, by itself, is sound. The greater the length of time the house is on the market, the greater amount of potential tenants that can see it. If more potential renters see it, the law of large numbers would dictate that someone at some point would love it and want it.
However, does this really work? I would argue it doesn’t. Huh? Why’s that? Isn’t it common sense?
Simply, the American consumer’s mind works differently now. There is an inundation of information being flung at them on a constant basis. Most of it is ignored; however, there are some marketing messages that get through (like a rental listing). If the consumer takes the time and makes an inquiry to visit the property, there is typically one shot to get them. Their attention span is limited.
This one shot means that the house has to look perfect. This visit needs to conclude with the prospective tenant loving the house. If they see or feel something they don’t like, it will probably turn them off and they will want to find another home. And there are many other rental houses on the market that look very similar. The competition is fierce!
So why does this matter? Maybe the diamonds in the rough that aren’t turned off by the home’s uncleanliness will be unearthed and they’ll take it. It’s certainly possible. But are renters who don’t care about the condition of the home desirable? If so, there may be disappointment when move-out time arrives and the home doesn’t look so great. Clean people typically want clean homes.
The other main reason is that once the marketing of the property begins, momentum is started. The rental is on the top of all the searches from rental websites, people who are waiting for a rental are told about it by their property managers, and it is fresh. This is when things typically happen for an average rental home- the first two weeks. Interested calls, inquiring e-mails, and subsequent showings come quickly. They need to be harnessed and converted into applications and security deposits.
But when the rental house isn’t up to the task, momentum is stunted. Interested, potential renters see the property in less than ideal shape and compare it to better kept homes on the market. The home loses out. Or the current tenant in the home is packing boxes to move and glares at the renter who is interrupting their evening after work. The house looks horrible and the vibe is bad. Potential renters flee to the next home. Can you blame them?
With rental homes, it’s more about quality time on the market and less about total time. Make sure the rental home is ready and most inviting when the most people want to look at it!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn More
Charlotte Property Management Weekly: 3 Approaches to Fixing Up a Rental Home
We sometimes take over management of homes that have been treated in, diplomatically-speaking, less than desired regard. It’s frustrating for the owners (and the property management company), especially in difficult economic times when cash is scarce.
The purpose of this article is not to talk about the root cause of this destruction (usually poor tenant screening), but rather the options available when faced with a rental home in bad shape.
It comes down to 3 potential approaches:
- Total Fix-Up: This is when everything is fixed so the home is in tip-top shape. New carpet, new paint, new everything! The upside to this approach is that the home will command top rent and a top tenant, while the downside is that it will demand top dollar to be spent by the owner. ROI on a 1-year rental with this approach is debatable.
- Partial Fix-Up: This is when the most pressing demands of the house are met. The house is cleaned well, the walls are touched up with paint, and the carpet is steam-cleaned. The goal is to make the house look like a good rental, not a show home. The upside to this approach is that it is much less expensive and will entice a good renter, while the downside is that it will not command top rent and the tenant will usually not be a neat-freak (we love neat freaks!!).
- No Fix-Up: This is when the home goes to market “as is.” Little to nothing is done to fix the home aesthetically and the tenant is asked to “have an open mind” and the property is listed as a “handyman’s special.” The upside to this approach is that repair costs are low and the home can be put on the market immediately. The downside is tough. Rents have to be lowered considerably, the quality of tenant suffers, and the house will be in even worse shape (think catastrophic) when the tenant moves out (evicted or otherwise).
So which is the best approach? The answer is the universal response in business school to any question- “it depends.” At different times and situations, each approach is appropriate. Many times this answer is dictated by finances. I mean, if you have no extra money, you are forced to use approach #3, right? And if your rental home has gotten to the point that it is absolutely disgusting, you probably have to opt for approach #1 at some point.
Generally-speaking, I’m a fan of approach #2. I try to stretch #2 as long as possible before I’m faced with the decision that the house has to go to approach #1 (or #3). Once I’m at that point, my preference is approach #1 (if finances allow).
The approach chosen for home fix-ups is a huge component on their ROI. One size does not fit all (as some are wont to do). Choose carefully (and profitably!)!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn More
Charlotte Property Management Weekly: Importance of Getting Paid from Rentals in the Next 5 Years
According to an article in Barron’s this month, the future of the real estate market is in rentals for the next five years. Most real estate agents are hoping this news is akin to the Bush White House claiming the existence of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction (WMD); hopefully, it is just another example of faulty American intelligence.
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: 700+ Credit Score Tenants Not the Best Option for your Rental Home?
He wanted to make sure that we placed a rental tenant into his home that had 700+ credit scores. That was it.
I told him I didn’t think that was a good idea; it would reject a lot of better suited applicants. He told me I was crazy (in so many words).
Learn More

