Charlotte Property Management Weekly: Groupons & Free Property Management
I’m a big (recent) fan of these “Groupons.” What a great deal for consumers! Groupons are like regular coupons, except on steroids; they offer discounts of 50%+ to use at local businesses. I am impressed and now a big supporter.
Early last week there was a groupon for one of the top restaurants in Charlotte offering $60 worth of food for $25. What a great deal! I bought one and used it the next night. It was as advertised; we ordered the food, got the check, and gave them the groupon coupon (I’m a poet and don’t even know it). They took $60 off the bill and we left without any police following.
As a consumer, I was pleased. Make that very, very pleased. However, as a business owner, my stomach turned. Why would this great restaurant agree to take such a huge price concession? Are these the type of patrons they want to attract? Why are they trying to compete on price? That’s for McDonalds and Wendy’s, for crying out loud!
I always came from the school of marketing that believed that business differentiation is achieved on 3 playing fields: quality, customer service, and price. As a business, you pick the two you want to be good at. Most (sustainable) businesses are very good at one, few are very good at two, and none are very good at three. It’s impossible to do; I challenge you to name one business that competes at all 3 (customer service, quality, and price) very well. This is what this great restaurant was trying to do (albeit it was a promotion and not normal business operations)!
I’ve seen a similar promotional tool offering months of free property management for new customers. I can certainly understand the logic as we (supposively) are in a “new normal” that everyone is talking about. Customers are price conscious and free is always better than paying, right? So most customers will gravitate towards this type of deal; it’s just like the groupon I loved, right? Or is it different?
I would argue that good property management is much different than having a meal in a nice restaurant. Sure, discounts on both are nice. But you can eat at a restaurant and leave after paying for the meal, no strings are attached. The restaurant knows that you will only come back (and pay their regular prices!) if you really enjoyed their food, staff, and overall experience. If there is some bite-back of any kind (aka food poisoning), you would never come back.
However, with free property management, you are signing a minimum of a one-year contract. You are like the Huey Lewis song, “Happy to be stuck with you.” But it’s fine because you’re not paying anything, right? Well, that’s true for the first few months anyway. Or is it? What about if the property management company does something that costs you a bunch of money, like places a destructive, non-paying tenant into your home? Then the few hundred dollars of savings from “free” property management won’t be so free. Costs of eviction, non-payment, and fix-up can really add up!
The point is that if the property management company you are looking into is offering you months of free property management (or other “groupon-like” discounts), you may want to look at what that means to their quality and customer service. No company is good at all three, and quality and customer service cost money to implement and execute! Good people are not cheap! And relationships bought cheaply are usually just that.
Saving money is great on one-time deals, like buying a great, name-brand shirt or an expensive meal from a great restaurant! But be wary when saving a few bucks initially means entering into a long-term, contractual relationship!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Mr. Smith’s Appointment Implies Real Estate’s Future is in Rent-To-Own & Rent-To-Sell
“Since they collapsed into conservatorship in September 2008, Fannie and Freddie have received $151 billion in taxpayer assistance. More will certainly be needed.”
“If this Mr. Smith goes to Washington as head of FHFA (Federal Housing Finance Agency), he will face a monumental challenge at a crucial time: how to protect taxpayers from even greater losses incurred by Fannie and Freddie.”
(Gretchen Morgenson in this week’s NY Times)
So, it looks like NC’s own Joseph Smith, Jr. will be tapped to run the FHFA. Big deal! Somebody’s got to do it, right? And when you’re looking for employment, the government seems to be the only people hiring, so it’s a logical step for him.
Who is this guy? I really have no idea. He’s been in the papers recently due to this appointment; all of the articles about him say that he has a reputation as “friend and rugged defender of the taxpayer.” I pay taxes so that sounds okay to me.
He is taking over an agency that is losing roughly $6B A MONTH over the past 27 months! Obviously, this agency has to be part of the government because after the first $18B loss quarter (or $72B loss year), it would be tough to keep his job in the private sector.
Anyway, what does his appointment mean? Let’s play his first day on the job out.
The first thing Mr. Smith does on his first day of work is ask his new secretary where the bathroom is and how many vacation days he has a year (everyone knows you can’t ask this in the interview!). The second thing he does is call his top guys and ask them how the heck they are losing so much taxpayer money. Their answers probably can be succinctly summarized into one statement, “We guaranteed a lot of bad loans to people who were not qualified enough to have them.”
Mr. Smith rubs his chin and says, “So, going forward, we should probably start only guaranteeing loans to more qualified people, right?” As his top lieutenants vigorously nod ascent and genuflect, he dismisses them from the room. “Sorry fellas, gotta go. It’s time for me to take it street-side and hug some oppressed taxpayers.”
His lieutenants quickly gather and surmise that “more qualified” probably means that Mr. Smith is saying FHFA needs to require “higher credit scores and down payments for loan applicants.” They pat themselves on the back for this revelation and scan the Washington Post to see what new DC restaurants would be good for lunch.
Back on Main Street, “more qualified” means a lot more people won’t be able to get loans to buy homes. It also means that a lot more people won’t be able to sell their homes (it takes two to tango, right?). And, furthermore, it means that real estate agents need to get used to doing even less brokerage business.
So all real estate agents need to pick up their equipment and go home? Hardly! Consumers still need to be able to transact real estate; the last time I checked, people are still marrying, divorcing, transferring, investing, having kids, sending kids into the real world, etc. They need to be able to acquire and dispose of homes.
The opportunity for real estate agents in the next few years will be placing potential buyers (who can’t get a loan now) into homes they will buy when they qualify for one; this means setting up rent-to-own (aka lease option or lease purchase) transactions. On the same token, it means opening up listings of vacant homes to rent-to-own tenants (also known as “rent-to-sell”).
Mr. Smith will be doing everything he can to stem massive loan losses. He is implicitly communicating to the real estate community that rent-to-own and rent-to-sell transactions will be the way to help customers achieve their goals over the next few years.
Will you change your business accordingly?
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Do You Want Rent-To-Own With That Rental Home? CAN YOU AFFORD TO MISS OUT?
Oh, the joy of the successful up-sell! Ask a simple question many times to many customers and make a ton more money! This is what all corporations pine for:
- McDonalds: “Do you want fries with that?”
- Amazon: “7 more dollars and get FREE shipping!”
- Dominos: “Order 2 pizzas at regular price and get free cheesy bread!”
Mix in a little doubt from a good salesperson and if gets even better!
- Meineke: “Sure, you could wait to replace your brake pads for another few months, BUT IS YOUR FAMILY’S WELL-BEING WORTH TAKING THAT CHANCE?”
- Bank of America: “Sure the market has been awful. But with your money sitting on the sidelines, COULD YOU STOMACH MISSING OUT ON THE BIGGEST STOCK MARKET JUMP IN HISTORY?”
- John’s Learning Center: “Yes, your child is doing well in school and is up to his grade’s reading level now. BUT WITH GLOBAL COMPETITION FROM INDIAN AND CHINESE CHILDREN, SHOULDN’T YOU BE ADDING TUTORING HOURS FOR LITTLE JIMMY INSTEAD OF SCALING BACK?”
The same tactics can be utilized in the rental home space.
You can up-sell your renter with: “Is this a house you might want to buy in the future? Do you want to lock into a rent-to-own arrangement and start building equity now?”
And then add a little doubt with: “Yes, it will be tough getting a loan in the next year or two, but what about after that? DO YOU WANT TO MISS OUT ON BUILDING UP A DOWNPAYMENT AND CLOSING COSTS NOW VERSUS THROWING YOUR MONEY AWAY JUST RENTING FOR THE NEXT TWO YEARS?”
“Up-selling” and “creating doubt” are not dirty sales terms; they are the backbone of successfully providing customers with the options they need to fulfill their personal goals. Ever been happy about being up-sold (like when the waiter in Paris told you to try their delicious signature dessert?)? Or happy about someone planting a seed of doubt (“You may want to re-think buying that computer. It graded really poorly in “Consumer Reports.”)?
Let’s look at the facts:
Many people want to rent, but even more people want to own! The banks just aren’t cooperating for most people currently.
And most property owners in this economic environment, who are renting out their homes, are open to selling them; at least that is what the feedback I’ve been getting from clients. I mean who couldn’t use a little more liquidity these days?
Up-selling and casting doubt on the customer’s current situation creates value, rather than detracts from it. And when more value is created, more revenue can be earned!
YOU WOULDN’T WANT TO MISS OUT ON MAKING MORE MONEY HELPING YOUR CUSTOMERS MORE, WOULD YOU?
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Charlotte Headlines Say Real Estate Market is on Rebound? Or Not?
“There are no facts, just interpretations.” Friedrich Nietzsche
On a whole, I like honesty. I like it when people tell me what they really think (within reason). And if they don’t have anything interesting or worthwhile to say, omission works well for me too. I like things clear and easily understood.
So it came to my chagrin when I was reading a headline of an article this week that blared, “N.C. foreclosure sales drop 42%.” Wow!! 42%? That’s almost half! Is the job market trending up in our southern paradise? 2011 must be when the US economy really rebounds led by the Tarheels of North Carolina! Charlotte is ready to do its part! This must mean that home price stabilization is around the corner and real estate will start picking up and lead our country to another streak of prosperity!
But wait… I really hadn’t heard anything about the local real estate market getting noticeably better; rather I’ve continued to hear the opposite. Homes sales in Charlotte have continued to dwindle (I read another headline saying that Charlotte home closings were down 23% in 10/10 when compared to 10/09!). Well, I guess that has nothing to do with people actually staying in their homes. So less foreclosed homes equals better capitalized consumers, which equals more consumers with jobs, which equals a better economy, which equals a more robust (and rising!) real estate market? Cool!
And then I actually read the article. The 42% foreclosure decrease was due to the halting of foreclosures due to questionable bank procedures. That explains it! So, this statistic is artificial and misleading. We’ll soon see a headline in the coming months saying that foreclosures are up 42%+ to make up for the halted foreclosures now.
And now that I think about it, our firm did have some closings that were held up because of this foreclosure freeze. So what does that mean about the 23% decline in home sale closings statistic compiled from 10/10 (when compared to 10/09)? Does that make that statistic artificial and misleading as well?
The clearest answer is “yeah, probably.” Who can figure out what’s going on? Maybe this is what Wall Street legend, Peter Lynch, was talking about when he said, “The man who studies macroeconomics for 15 minutes a year wastes 10 minutes.” There are too many moving parts to get a true picture of reality!
It’s like the rock band that labors through the reading of their 2,000 word concert review in Rolling Stone magazine and only wants to know one thing: “Do they think we rock?” I just want the same type of clarity from the headlines I read.
Are things getting better or worse?
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: The Options Available to Owners of Vacant Homes
As a Charlotte property manager specializing in lease options (rent-to-own and rent-to-sell), we get many calls from home sellers “exploring their options” about their vacant properties (unlike Obama, my puns are typically not intended). So, as a public service, I’ll run through the available options:
- Strategic default (I think this is what it is being called): Stop paying the mortgage and taking the credit score beating like a man
- Put the property on the market for sale: If the home is special and priced well, it will sell in some period of time. If not, eat the mortgage every month until the banks start lending again.
- Rent the property out: Get most of the mortgage paid every month by the tenant. Keep a tenant in the property until the market comes back and then place the home up for sale.
- Rent-to-sell the property: Put a rent-to-own tenant into the property who will pay the mortgage and potentially buy the home during their lease period.
- Rent out the property and then put it on the market: In my experience, this leads to disappointed sellers and upset tenants.
- Arson: Not recommended. And, no, this is not a service we offer!
All of these approaches obviously have pros and cons (like jail time). Depending on each respective person’s needs and tolerance for risk, each approach could be the appropriate one.
And to conclude the public service announcement, please contact your local property manager for further details.
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn More
Charlotte Property Management Weekly: Your Rental Home Wants You to Wait Until It’s Ready
Every client we’ve ever had has wanted as little vacancy time for their rental as possible. Zero days are optimal; every day after zero winds up costing them money in utilities, mortgage payments, and maintenance. Not wanting to lose any money leads to a mentality of getting the home on the market as soon as possible, regardless of condition and resident situation.
So some clients want us to put their homes on the market prior to them being ready for occupancy. What I mean by this is that the home has not been completely repaired and there are still personal items in the house. They (or their current tenants) also are within the process of moving.
The rationale, by itself, is sound. The greater the length of time the house is on the market, the greater amount of potential tenants that can see it. If more potential renters see it, the law of large numbers would dictate that someone at some point would love it and want it.
However, does this really work? I would argue it doesn’t. Huh? Why’s that? Isn’t it common sense?
Simply, the American consumer’s mind works differently now. There is an inundation of information being flung at them on a constant basis. Most of it is ignored; however, there are some marketing messages that get through (like a rental listing). If the consumer takes the time and makes an inquiry to visit the property, there is typically one shot to get them. Their attention span is limited.
This one shot means that the house has to look perfect. This visit needs to conclude with the prospective tenant loving the house. If they see or feel something they don’t like, it will probably turn them off and they will want to find another home. And there are many other rental houses on the market that look very similar. The competition is fierce!
So why does this matter? Maybe the diamonds in the rough that aren’t turned off by the home’s uncleanliness will be unearthed and they’ll take it. It’s certainly possible. But are renters who don’t care about the condition of the home desirable? If so, there may be disappointment when move-out time arrives and the home doesn’t look so great. Clean people typically want clean homes.
The other main reason is that once the marketing of the property begins, momentum is started. The rental is on the top of all the searches from rental websites, people who are waiting for a rental are told about it by their property managers, and it is fresh. This is when things typically happen for an average rental home- the first two weeks. Interested calls, inquiring e-mails, and subsequent showings come quickly. They need to be harnessed and converted into applications and security deposits.
But when the rental house isn’t up to the task, momentum is stunted. Interested, potential renters see the property in less than ideal shape and compare it to better kept homes on the market. The home loses out. Or the current tenant in the home is packing boxes to move and glares at the renter who is interrupting their evening after work. The house looks horrible and the vibe is bad. Potential renters flee to the next home. Can you blame them?
With rental homes, it’s more about quality time on the market and less about total time. Make sure the rental home is ready and most inviting when the most people want to look at it!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn More
Charlotte Property Management Weekly: 3 Approaches to Fixing Up a Rental Home
We sometimes take over management of homes that have been treated in, diplomatically-speaking, less than desired regard. It’s frustrating for the owners (and the property management company), especially in difficult economic times when cash is scarce.
The purpose of this article is not to talk about the root cause of this destruction (usually poor tenant screening), but rather the options available when faced with a rental home in bad shape.
It comes down to 3 potential approaches:
- Total Fix-Up: This is when everything is fixed so the home is in tip-top shape. New carpet, new paint, new everything! The upside to this approach is that the home will command top rent and a top tenant, while the downside is that it will demand top dollar to be spent by the owner. ROI on a 1-year rental with this approach is debatable.
- Partial Fix-Up: This is when the most pressing demands of the house are met. The house is cleaned well, the walls are touched up with paint, and the carpet is steam-cleaned. The goal is to make the house look like a good rental, not a show home. The upside to this approach is that it is much less expensive and will entice a good renter, while the downside is that it will not command top rent and the tenant will usually not be a neat-freak (we love neat freaks!!).
- No Fix-Up: This is when the home goes to market “as is.” Little to nothing is done to fix the home aesthetically and the tenant is asked to “have an open mind” and the property is listed as a “handyman’s special.” The upside to this approach is that repair costs are low and the home can be put on the market immediately. The downside is tough. Rents have to be lowered considerably, the quality of tenant suffers, and the house will be in even worse shape (think catastrophic) when the tenant moves out (evicted or otherwise).
So which is the best approach? The answer is the universal response in business school to any question- “it depends.” At different times and situations, each approach is appropriate. Many times this answer is dictated by finances. I mean, if you have no extra money, you are forced to use approach #3, right? And if your rental home has gotten to the point that it is absolutely disgusting, you probably have to opt for approach #1 at some point.
Generally-speaking, I’m a fan of approach #2. I try to stretch #2 as long as possible before I’m faced with the decision that the house has to go to approach #1 (or #3). Once I’m at that point, my preference is approach #1 (if finances allow).
The approach chosen for home fix-ups is a huge component on their ROI. One size does not fit all (as some are wont to do). Choose carefully (and profitably!)!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn More
Charlotte Property Management Weekly: $200 Rental Application Fees- Genius?
I don’t find myself being amazed at things very often, but I have to admit I was taken aback when I saw a large property management firm change their application fee from $25 to $200.
My initial thoughts were, “who is willing to pay that?” and “how can I justify charging that much for a rental application fee?”
I don’t know why they changed their rental application fee, but I have a guess- they got way too many applications from candidates who would never qualify to rent! Their people were inundated! So they used common sense.
In general, if a company wants less people to apply, then all they have to do is raise their application price. Corporations in every industry do something like this to control demand. If they want to sell less sweaters ($50 retail), then they raise the price to $100. If they want to sell more, they lower the price to $25. Simple.
But a smaller number of applicants equal less people who may rent the house. That’s bad! Maybe… But what if the tenants are screening themselves so that the non-qualifiers don’t even bother applying? If the probable non-qualifiers know they are borderline applicants, they still may be willing to gamble away $25 on an application fee. But $200? Not very likely!
Another thing I liked is that the property management firm refunds the $200 application fee if the tenant is approved. Now, good applicants know there is no risk to applying at $200 a pop. This property management firm is using price to lower the amount of resources needed to screen applicants (by lowering the number of applicants themselves!). They are also freeing their people up to work on higher margin activity (like filling the rental properties with their smaller, but better, applicant pool).
What’s not to like? Should every firm go to $200 per rental application?
As I racked my brain to figure out why I shouldn’t raise our rental application fee to $200, I came up with several reasons:
- Applicants who don’t qualify will get really angry; not $25 loss angry, but $200 loss angry (which could equal the money earned in several days of work). This can really stress out employees and make it so they want to work for someone who has $25 application fees and not get screamed at everyday.
- Employees would need to be prepared to be doggedly challenged on turned-down applications. That means the tenant screening process would need to be super- tight and really easy to explain. This would also remove some (in my opinion) much needed subjectivity in the application screening process.
- The main objective of changing the application price is to save time. Unfortunately, almost every person that calls is new to the firm. That means the $200 rental application fee will have to be explained in every phone call! I’m getting a headache just writing that.
I still think it’s a great idea; I’m curious to see how it will work in practice. I’m still a middle-of-the-road $75 rental application fee believer, but am ready to be convinced otherwise!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn More
Charlotte Property Management Weekly: Another Ploy in Rental Home Fraud
Perhaps the next “big thing” in rental fraud is high-jacked rental house ads. We just started managing a property and were surprised when potential tenants started contacting us about a different Craig’s List ad on the same house (at a much lower rental rate); they were wondering which of the Craig’s List ads for this rental house was legitimate.
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Reaction to Proposed FHA Loan Changes for Those in Lease Option Contracts: “No Sweat”
It reminds me of one of my high school friend’s patented lines when he would see one of us wearing an ugly shirt or some God-awful hat, “I didn’t think there was a possible way for you to get even less girls, but you may have found it.”
To extend this wisdom to the real estate industry, if real estate agents didn’t think there was a possible way to do even less brokerage business, FHA may have found a way.
Learn More