Charlotte Property Management Monthly: Multiple Rental Offer Situations: Is Engagement The Same As Marriage?
So you’re walking down the street the day after successfully proposing marriage to your girlfriend, who now (you’ve been told) is to be referred as your “fiancée”. You’re happy and are convinced she was meant to be “The One”. But, wait; is that the beautiful Sasha Blue across the street? The girl of your dreams who always had those model boyfriends that put you permanently into the “friend” category? Is she looking at you? I think she is!
As you get closer, Miss Blue excitedly runs up to you. “Max, is that you? I was hoping to run into you! I finally got rid of that no-good Antonio! Wow… Is this the first time we are both single at the same time? How exciting! I’d love to catch up!”
As your heart races, your memory of getting down on one knee the night before is fading fast. Is it too late to run a reverse and go after Miss Blue? Engagement isn’t legally binding, is it? It’s a very interesting conundrum!
That is the same question that faces property management companies when multiple tenants apply for the same property at different times. At what engagement point prior to move-in is a tenant “locked” in and the property manager must forsake all other suitors?
Let’s look at a potential scenario: Tenant A applies for a property and is approved. They have not put a deposit down on the property yet. Tenant B sees the property the next day and loves it. They are a stronger applicant and are willing to pay more money per month. However, when talking with Tenant B, Tenant A puts down the deposit. Company policy is that whoever puts down the deposit first with an approved application gets the house. So, is Tenant B out of luck?
In most scenarios, yes. But there is a caveat. The property manager works for the owner. It is their job to get the best applicant that fits the home owner’s (aka their client’s) goals. Should the overall mandate to pursue what’s best for the owner trump company policy?
The easy answer is “of course!” The practical answer is yes and no- the solid, business school “it depends” response. On one hand, I don’t think it is reasonable to take a deposit from an approved tenant, keep the house on the market at a higher rate, and then renege on the agreement if another tenant appears that is willing to pay more. That could leave an applicant who dealt with the property management in good faith potentially homeless and dealing with the hassle of changing addresses, utilities, moving vans, and losing their piece of mind. This generates hate mail (rightfully so).
But, on the other hand, at what point is it reasonable to accept competing offers?
I believe that up until the tenant is told definitively that the home is theirs is a reasonable time to protect the owner’s interests. That may mean that if multiple applications come in (and even after deposits are put down), there is still time to review the applicants and decide which one is best for the owner. If the applicants are similar, then the first one who applied and put down a deposit should be given first dibs.
However, what about if the following applicant situations present themselves?
1. An applicant with a 600 credit score with average landlord history is approved and puts down a deposit before a 700 credit score applicant with great landlord history
2. 2 applicants are equal but one is willing to pay a higher monthly rent
3. 2 applicants are equal but one is willing to pay the year of rent upfront
4. One applicant is willing to move-in 3 weeks prior to the other
In these situations (if prior to giving “official” notice that the house is locked in for a certain tenant), then it is really imperative to choose the tenant that offers the best deal for the owner.
However, once official notice is given, I don’t believe it is ethical to offer the home to anyone else, regardless of the deal offered. The only way to supersede this is if the one tenant “buys out” the other in a separate negotiation. Money can make things happen!
So, if you asked to marry your fiancée, told her she was definitely “The One”, and gave her a ring, Miss Blue should be off limits. It may not be legally binding, but it’s the right thing to do.
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Is “Final Tenant Approval” Desirable For Landlords?
As I was thinking about this question the other day, I had a flashback to my high school history class. The first thing I learned from this trip down memory lane was that it is indeed possible to daydream about hours of daydreaming.
The second thing I learned was the strange applicability of our class’s discussion on democracy in regards to approving prospective tenant applications. The question was whether a true democracy (everyone makes the decisions) or a representative democracy (“experts” were voted in to make the decisions) was better.
The effectiveness of a true democracy was illustrated by a story that Aristotle told. It goes something like this:
You’re on a big cruise ship with 100 other passengers. Everything is going fine until it is clear a major storm is on the horizon. The ship is about to navigate a tight channel where it could easily be dashed upon the rocks if steered incorrectly. Any wrong move would spell imminent disaster for all the passengers. What to do?
A true democracy would offer a vote to everyone on the ship to determine which way to steer the rudder (“Raise your hand if you think we should steer right. Okay, after the final count of hands, the ‘Lefts’ have it.”). Aristotle said he’d prefer to rely on the captain and his crew to make that decision. This discourse lead to our founding fathers (many years later) settling on a representative democracy as America’s form of government; a true democracy sounds better, but wouldn’t work as well in practice. The captain, due to his experience and expertise, would know best.
Tenant selection is one of the most important duties a property manager performs for landlords. Tenants make or break (unfortunately, literally sometimes) a rental property. They will pay and treat the property well, or they won’t. Knowing who they are as people and their background greatly mitigates this risk. This is why the front end tenant screening by a property manager is so vital. And experience in tenant selection counts!
Some landlords want to be hands-on in this process. I don’t have an issue to this prior to going to market. But if the hands-on treatment is expected to go on for the duration of the tenant selection process, there is little need for a property manager. I would recommend posting a few rental ads and going the “do-it-yourself” route. This works for some people. It also (potentially) saves money, but greatly increases the risk.
It reminds me of my favorite all-time television show, 24. Kiefer Sutherland (Jack) would only try to bandage people with life-threatening injuries in the field if it was an absolute emergency. Most of the time he would just send them to CTU’s medical clinic for treatment. And, at no point did he ask Chloe (from CTU’s IT staff) to give him pointers on bandaging the wound. He trusted the professionals.
And so should landlords. “Final tenant approval” can be used as a cop-out by property managers. If things go south with a tenant, “final tenant approval” makes it very easy for the property manager to say, “Well, you gave final approval for the tenant we placed, so what happened isn’t really my fault.” I even sometimes see property management companies advertise this “feature”, making it appear to be desirable! All I can say is that if my sister died on the operating table and the doctor came to me and said, “You know, I asked you for “final removal approval” on which part of her organ to cut out… you said ‘OK’…” I would be incredulous! I mean, what do I know about medical procedures? Why would he ask me what to do? I’m paying for his expertise!
True democracy may sound good, but a representative democracy works much better in practice. Let the “final tenant approval” come from the expert you hired!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Too Many Repair Requests? 5 Methods To Stop The (Cash Flow) Bloodshed
As a property management company, we work to maximize the cash flow of our clients. Period. We don’t have a problem admitting that.
Sometimes things break in rental homes and that decreases the cash flow our clients receive. They don’t like it, and we don’t either. However, it is part of the game (pardon my street talk), so it is a necessary expense. Sometimes.
Normally if a repair policy is explained to tenants properly at the lease signing, there aren’t any problems. The landlord is responsible for operational issues; that is, if there isn’t any evidence of negligence by the tenant (if there is, the “Sorry if you smashed your toilet because your girlfriend dumped you for being volatile, but the bill goes to you…” message is sent). Then the easy stuff (changing light bulbs, air filters, etc.) is taken care of by the tenant. It’s simple stuff and everyone gets along grandly.
If the home is on the newer side and maintained, there just aren’t that many maintenance calls. Most people want their homes to operate properly (“hey, it’s nice to have the dryer dry clothes in less than 3 hours, so maybe I’ll clean the lint filter occasionally”), so they do the small things to keep it that way.
However, there are some tenants that seem to discover an awful lot of problems that they want the owner to fix. And when they are compared to other tenants, their identity becomes painfully obvious. The calls and the e-mails of their problems continue month-after-month. It gets to the point that everyone involved with managing the property has the tenant’s contact information memorized (“Oh, 704-xxx-xxxx? Mrs. X must be calling from work today.”) Sometimes, the repair requests are a string of bad luck and legitimate; often the tenant is trying to take advantage of the landlord’s altruism and is under the impression they don’t have to lift a finger because someone else will take care of them.
Repairs really hurt cash flow. But if the repairs aren’t done, unhappy tenants also hurt cash flow by trying to use their seemingly one point of leverage (holding back rent) to get what they want done. So what to do?
Before getting to some techniques to ward off unwarranted repair requests, I want to first iterate that almost all tenants (that I’ve worked with, at least) are reasonable with their repair requests. Most have busy lives and can’t be bothered will illegitimate claims. It’s not a huge problem on a whole. I find that doing the repairs that are requested builds trust and keeps everything running smoothly. So requested repairs should usually be done.
For the tenants that abuse the repair system, here are the top techniques to stop the illegitimate request flow:
1. Recalibrate expectations on repairs: Before the next repair is done, a meeting should be set with all principals on the lease. The purpose of the meeting (or call) is to reexamine the lease and go over exactly what is covered by the landlord and what is not. Also, it is probably time to schedule a walk-through of the house to make sure the maintenance agreement is being followed.
2. Alert the repair vendors that fraud is suspected: Vendors who visit the home should be put on alert. They can provide information about what claims are legitimate. If a claim is due to non-compliance with the maintenance agreement or rough play, the tenant needs to be billed for the issue, not the landlord!
3. Push back: If it was your house, what would you be calling a repairman fix, and what would you be doing yourself? That question is a good start to figuring out what repairs may be unnecessary for the landlord to cover.
4. Keep at code: The landlord is responsible, by law, to keep the rental home at building code. Nothing more. What is being requested beyond that?
5. Relocation: Maybe it’s worth asking the tenants if they would be more comfortable in someone else’s home?
Though this issue isn’t overly common, it can be uncommonly expensive and will continually siphon cash flow. If you find yourself signing over the monthly rent to the handyman month-after-month, it may be time to try something new!
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Recruiting Great Tenants- Your Team Is Only As Good As Your Players
It’s been said the most important part of major college coaching is recruiting. A team’s ultimate potential is limited by their talent level. Sure, good coaching can make good players better, but great players are the reason teams win championships and are consistently good.
I started thinking about this the other day when a friend of mine called. He told me that a friend of his bought a property management company inCharlotteand it is proving to be a nightmare. The company he bought has sloppy books, awful employees, and a large cache of substandard properties that are in disrepair. But most importantly, they have a lot of tenants that have not been paying rent and have stayed in the houses rent-free for months. His friend is watching his investment go up in flames as he tries to salvage what’s left.
This made me think. What would be the characteristic that would be most important to measure the strength of a property management company? Is it good employees, growing cash flow, long-term contracts in place, sound business procedures, or something else? They are all obviously very important. But what’s the ultimate key to success?
As I thought more about it, my head began to hurt and my mind drifted to sports:
Why did Coach Nick Nolte agree to buy Ricky a new truck in the movie, Blue Chips? Why are there so many recruiting scandals in college athletics? Why do I read about “tampering” charges in the professional leagues when teams illegally contact players when they are not allowed? Why are college coaches only allowed to send potential recruits a limited number of text messages and are restricted on how often they can call them? Why do coaches work harder in the offseason traveling to visit recruits than they do during the season? Why do the Charlotte Bobcats think they can rebuild the team with late round draft picks?
Then the answer occurred to me. The players are the most important thing. They directly dictate the success of a coach. If a team has great players, they will be a good team (no matter the coaching quality). That is why recruiting is so important and organizations are willing to push the envelope on wooing potential stars.
As a rule, every top-tier athletic team puts a premium on signing great players. And this is the same mentality that top-tier landlords and property managers, like you, must have to build a strong property management company and investment portfolio. It’s about getting great tenants for your properties. They will directly dictate your success.
When a great tenant applies for a property, it is imperative to let them know that you want them. You need them. You will treat them like gold if they would just sign with you (on the lease). Text and call them every hour (there are no contact restrictions in business, only the weirdness factor of over-communication). Add incentives. Buy them the pony they always wanted, as long as it is munching the grass in your rental home’s yard! Let them know your love will never end if they can out down a deposit today.
Great tenants provide so many great benefits! They pay on-time and in full providing consistent cash flow. They take care of the properties so they don’t fall into neglect. They let you know if your employees are lacking or slacking. They even take care of minor repairs on their own!
Your team, investment, and/or company is only as strong as the players it has signed. Maniacally pursue the best, get them under contract, and rest will take care of itself!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Rental Home Walk-Throughs: 4 Ways to Protect Yourself
“You know you have a good compromise when both sides are slightly unhappy.” (Many Authors Credited)
As a Charlotte property manager, my least favorite part of the job are the end-of-lease walk-throughs; that is, when the tenant moves out, and we visit the property to check out its condition. If there are damages, we need to decide whether they are “normal wear and tear” (no charge to the tenant) or damages that need to be repaired from the tenant funds. It’s very subjective.
There are three scenarios when it comes to these property manager walk-throughs. The house is left in:
1. Great condition: The tenant gets their security deposit back and the owner doesn’t have to pay much to get the home in market shape. Everyone is happy.
2. Mediocre Condition: Some of the damage is normal wear and tear, and some of it was caused by too much rough play by the tenant. This is where the greatest conflicts occur between owner and tenant.
3. Poor Condition: The security deposit is basically conceded by the tenant. They know they don’t deserve anything back and hope that there is no future contact concerning the property. The owner is able to use the security deposit to mitigate repair costs.
I’m going to focus on the most challenging situation, the home left in “mediocre condition”. This can elicit two different responses from the same walk-through report:
Owner: “You’re killing me! That tenant treated my home like a kid’s tree house and they are only being charged $500 for damages? Add a zero please! They should be put in jail! Did they ever think to cover the food in microwave so it didn’t erupt all inside of it? Did they decide to save money on towels and wipe their hands on the walls? The carpet was new when they moved in! You’re being easy on them! You represent me, remember? Why do you like them so much?”
Tenant: “You’re killing me! I treated that home like my own! I cleaned it daily. We took our shoes off when we were inside (which we shouldn’t have even bothered with, being that the carpet was shoddy-looking when we moved in- I told you this!! Remember??) There might have been a couple things wrong, but I could have fixed them for like $50! $500? Are you crazy?? I thought you liked me! This is highway robbery! You’ll be hearing from my attorney!”
Property managers are really trying to do the right thing, but are stuck in the middle of competing interests. It’s sort of like being friends with both the wife and the husband when they are in the midst of a divorce. You want to be friends with both (like usual), without either of them feeling slighted. Practically-speaking, that can be tough to do!
To make this experience as clean and easy as possible, I’d offer the following four suggestions to landlords:
1. Trust your instincts- there is no “right” answer and it is usually impossible to make both parties entirely happy
2. Be specific on damages and document repair costs
3. Have a consistent methodology on how costs are assessed
4. Take pictures or use video during the walk-through so tenants can see the damages they are being charged for
Though rental home walk-throughs can’t always be pain-free, there are ways to limit potential fall-out from this necessary part of the property management business.
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: When Should Rental Rates be Negotiated?
As a Charlotte-area property manager, we get contacted (usually via e-mail) by prospective tenants asking us if the owner is willing to accept less than the listed rental rate. This question gets asked before the tenant even looks at the rental home.
I guess with the “new normal”, Group-On world we are living in, some might assume that consumers are not willing to look at something that isn’t drastically reduced; I don’t necessarily agree with this. But it does bring up the question: How does a property manager answer such a query on an immediate price reduction? There are obviously two ways to do this.
Question from Prospective Tenant: Will you lower the price even though I haven’t even seen the home and have done nothing besides click the rental ad to e-mail you?
Answer from Property Manager: Yes! How much would you prefer to pay? The list price is merely a starting point for negotiations, my astute friend! Property management’s new business model is akin to the “suggested donation” for entrance into a benefit concert. By the way, all the new chairs in our office are of the “EZ-Fold” style; we sit on them while eating our Burger King “Have It Your Way” Whopper, Jrs.
OR
Answer from Property Manager: No! The listing price is the listing price! I’m offended by your audaciousness, you crooked wretch! In a battle of wills, we will win. Think about it: our downside is that the rental home is on the market for a few more days; your downside is homelessness. The rent has now doubled for you! Scram!
Neither of these is a winning response (caution: do not use these responses at home or the office), but they do cover each end of the spectrum of responses to this “negotiation.” The best answer is somewhere in the middle of this spectrum. But where?
First of all, let’s clarify what a “negotiation” is. A true negotiation is where both sides give something of value and, in turn, receive something in return. In this example, the property manager is giving a discount in rent (real dollars), and the tenant has not even committed to visiting the property (let alone filling out an application and putting down a deposit)!
This example is not a negotiation; it is an example of a fishing expedition. Or a game show called, “How Desperate is the Owner to Rent Out their Property?” So giving away rent money for nothing is an obvious no-go. The best answer to an immediate query about reducing the rent would be something along the lines of, “I’m not sure how the owners would feel about that. If you visit the property and are interested, it is certainly something I could ask them.”
Okay, this does risk alienating some people. However, if the rental price is close to market value, then other renters will materialize. However, if the house has been on the market for a while, this may be a game you want to play. Proceed cautiously so you don’t wind up throwing free lawn care and daily Bojangles biscuits in as well to close the deal.
What about if the tenants do look at the property, are interested, and then try to negotiate the rental price? If the owner is willing to reduce the rent, I think an argument could be made to do this; however, this would be only if the tenants are strong candidates (great credit scores, landlord history, and income). Tenants who pay on time, keep the property in good shape, and do not create problems for others (neighbors, police, and property managers…) are worth their weight in gold. If they do not fit this bill, I would decline any reduction in rent.
Rental rate negotiation may be subjective, but common negotiation rules still apply. Make sure you get when you give! No “quid” without “quo”!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Property Management Owner’s Dilemma: Get Bigger, Stay the Same, or Sell Out?
Business is a funny thing; one is never allowed to be satisfied. If you start a company, grow it, and begin to cash flow it, then that’s good, right? Isn’t that the idea? I thought it was, at least.
However, it really isn’t if you read the news, watch television, or attend any business group meetings. The things that people want to talk about are:
1. What are your growth figures in terms of revenue? Projected out to 2015?
2. Is your social media and digital strategy sound? Have you made the time and financial investments?
3. Have you thought about geographical expansion? Franchise? Office openings?
And on and on and on. There apparently isn’t any downtime allowed! If you sit pat, you’re destined to fail. You must reach for the stars of worldwide domination! The purpose of making money is to reinvest it! Get on it! Get bigger! Now!
So rapid growth is left as the only option, unless you want to be considered a “burned-out” property manager. If you choose to pursue slower, organic growth, you can be called “uninspired”, a “non-visionary”, and lazy. No one writes articles on business people who stay the course! Those stories got chopped out early in the editing room. But despite many loud naysayers to the contrary, staying the same is certainly a very viable option. It’s just the “keeping on, keeping on” strategy. Nothing is wrong with that!
But what about if you really are “uninspired” now? You are burned out! You are a property management company owner (or real estate agent) who doesn’t want to deal with the business anymore. You are looking to get out and sell out. How would you do this?
You could hire a business broker to find someone who wants to add property management to their real estate brokerage company, or just wants to own a stand-alone property management company. These instances are pretty rare and the business broker would truly be earning their money if they found someone who will buy your smaller firm (under $1M in revenues)!
What is more likely is that you would sell your management accounts to another property management firm. For example, I received a letter the other day from one of the largest property managers in town; this letter was undoubtedly sent to every property management company in the area. The letter asked to buy up the property management accounts we had.
In mergers & acquisitions speak, they were utilizing a typical roll-up strategy of buying up every smaller company in the area to accelerate their growth. They had no interest in our systems or procedures; they just wanted to throw our management clients into their management machine. This would be a fast way for them to grow rapidly. It also would be a quick way for “uninspired” property managers to get out of the business and make some quick money off of their company. A true win-win? Possibly!
To grow, stay, or go- it’s a personal decision that shouldn’t be the result of other’s expectations. There are options available no matter what you and your company’s strategy is!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Are Monthly Rental Home Inspections Desirable?
I was asked recently if our property management company provided monthly rental home inspections for houses under management. I assume what was meant was the kind of inspection where we go into the property, check everything out, eat dinner with the tenants, and then help any young children with their homework. Then we’d set a time to visit again the next month before hugging goodbye. Smiles would be all around.
This type of inspection would work if we were renting out the “Little House on the Prairie” and the harvest was plentiful that fall. But I’m not even sure how welcome we’d be if the rain wasn’t coming and Pa had to sell one of their prized cows to make ends meet. And I’m not sure how happy they would be to have another mouth to feed when we stopped by for our monthly inspection; we’d, of course, be slightly embarrassed that dinner conversation would focus on the eviction our clients, the Olsen’s, are ordering us to execute on them (“If rent isn’t paid, file for eviction on the Ingalls’s promptly on the 11th! No more famine excuses!”).
Unfortunately (and fortunately), modern life isn’t like this anymore. Tenants don’t want the property manager coming around; they’re busy and don’t want their property managers tied into their social life (usually).
However, rental home inspections are sometimes necessary. But how often should they be conducted? Let’s examine the pros and cons of a monthly visit:
Pros of monthly inspections:
1. Knowing what the tenants are up to
2. Lease violations would be quickly recognized and dealt with
Cons of monthly inspections:
1. Become a preferred rental vendor of the old KGB and Gestapo
2. Limited benefit for costs associated with frequent visits
3. Tenants will be hateful and not rent from you
4. Pushback from tenant privacy issues
5. Forced to deal with issues that arise- do you evict? Tough decisions and ultimatums have to be handed down, and then they need to be carried out.
More on #5. The “sometimes ignorance is bliss” is a tough one to explain. “I always want to know what is going on in my rental house!” Do you?
If violations are found, are you ready to evict? If the tenant is paying on time and in full every month, do you want your property manager looking for reasons to get rid of the tenants? Eviction is expensive! And when the tenants are being evicted, no one is paying the rent anymore. That’s a double whammy on costs.
Well, warnings could be issued. “If this happens one more time, then you’re out!” If there is evidence that it did happen the following month, you really do have to evict them now. If not, what is the purpose of these monthly inspections anyway? Inspections are not meant to paint the owners into a corner. At the end of the day, you want paying tenants to stay, right?
Inspections can be useful; some violations need to be dealt with immediately. However, even the Ingalls’s wouldn’t think it was rude if you stopped by on a much less regular basis!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Big Bank Lessons: How to Sell More by Charging More- It’s All in the Ask
It’s not how much you charge, but how you ask.
“Even in this ‘new economy’? Everyone is so price conscious!”
A friend of mine was going to Mexico and I wanted to surprise her by giving her some Mexican pesos for the trip. Being that Charlotte (drum roll, please) is the 2nd largest banking city in the country, I didn’t think it would be a big deal; I only planned on getting 20 dollars worth of pesos.
I walked into Wachovia across the street and asked for the twenty dollars worth of pesos. They said there was a $15 fee, so it probably wouldn’t be worth getting it from them. They suggested the airport, a travel agency, or Bank of America. I found it interesting that they suggested a competitor; good for them!
I walked a few blocks to Bank of America and figured I’d cut through the chase. I immediately asked the bank teller what they charged for exchanging dollars for pesos. She said they didn’t charge anything; the conversion cost was factored into the exchange rate (aka lowering it). That sounded swell to me.
The question is: how much money did Bank of America make on this transaction? I really have no idea. But they got the sale! The real exchange rate could have been 20 pesos to the dollar, and they gave me an exchange rate of 10 to the dollar. That’s robbery (of course), but I didn’t know it. I just knew I wasn’t paying a $15 conversion fee on top of the $20 of pesos!
So I thought about this in the context of a la carte real estate pricing, specifically in property management. When I tell a customer that our fee for power washing their house is a 15% “project management fee” on top of the real cost, it does not come off very smoothly. The customer feels the exact amount of our fee and how it is increasing their total cost. There is always a strange pause after this pricing explanation, but I thought it was worth it as it provided a high level of transparency on how and where we make our money.
However, can a case be made to present this differently? If power washing costs us $70, and we tell the customer it will cost them $100 to do it, that’s not dishonest. I mean, do you e-mail the Gap and ask them what the actual price the shirt you bought from them cost? Or ask McDonald’s what your soda actually cost? Of course not! You either like the price and buy the product, or you don’t, and you walk.
That conversation with no added fees goes a lot smoother. I mean, what sounds better: $100 cost with no “hidden fees” or $70 plus a 15% fee? Surprisingly, the $100! The profit margin of the first presentation method (which sounds better) is approximately 66% more! And the customers are happier and not triple-checking their monthly statement to make sure the 15% was computed correctly.
In conclusion, the way pricing is offered is important. It’s a way to have your cake and eat it too, a true win-win-win. You can charge more, while selling more, while making your customers happier!
There might be a reason that big banks generate so much revenue; they know how to ask their customers for it!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Why Rent-To-Sell is “Hot, Hot, Hot” in Today’s Cold Real Estate Market
Q: Why do robbers rob banks?
A: Because that’s where the money is
Q: Why have home sellers shifted their vacant homes from “for sale” to “rent-to-sell”?
A: Because that’s where the future buyers are
It’s really that simple. I probably sound like a broken record, but I still see vacant homes trying to sell for full market prices. And it’s just not working. Let me repeat: it’s just not working.
My old economics professor always said that the lottery was a tax for people who didn’t pay attention in math class. He meant that the odds of winning are so astronomical that buying a ticket is just a waste of money.
In a way, I feel the same about most vacant homes. Let’s look at the math:
Find the number of houses that sold in your region last year (let’s call this number “X”). Now compare X with what the home sales numbers were annually in the past 5 years. X is comparatively low. That is obviously not good news for home sellers. Unfortunately, home sales have trended downward (and are expected to continue to do so).
Now take X and cut it in half. What? Unfortunately, half of X is distressed home sales (foreclosure, REO, short sale, etc.). This “half of X” gives us the true number of people who are now shopping for your home (if it is listed for sale at close to full value). That’s not good.
So the math is basically saying that there are way fewer (way, way, way fewer!) home buyers out there for houses that are not distressed.
Note: For non-math majors (and lottery enthusiasts), you can also gather this information informally; just ask “How’s the sale process going?” to anyone who has their non-distressed home currently on the market for sale. They may respond with a half-laugh, menacing glance, or a choice word (not a nice one).
Then ask anyone who is trying to get a home loan the same question. You’ll probably get a similar response.
So many vacant homes are for sale. And many buyers can’t get a loan to buy your house. How could a win-win situation be created here?
This is why the rent-to-sell method of home selling is hot. Or, if you prefer to stick with the old song, rent-to-sell is “hot, hot, hot.”
How does rent-to-sell work? Buyers, who can’t qualify for a loan now, rent your home for 1-3 years until they qualify. Then they buy it at market price when the real estate market has rebounded. This solves the problem of home sellers eating the mortgage on a vacant home every month and buyers not having a place to call their own.
Rent-to-sell can be a great solution to escape the cold, expensive reality of a vacant home that isn’t selling!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn More