Charlotte Property Management Monthly: If You Can’t Sell, Rent: 3 Steps to Get a Great Tenant
Rental homes are in a full-on, undeniable uptrend! A recent real estate article headline blared, “Property Managers Set to Rule the World! 1.8M new tenants to enter the rental pool in the next two years.” Exciting stuff for us stodgy property managers!
While this leads to raised glasses (no plastic cups- they’re actual glass now!) in the property management industry, it is unwelcome news for homeowners trying to sell their homes. The math is easy to calculate: there is roughly the same amount of people moving into homes every year. So if 1.8 million more of them are now renting, there are 1.8 million less of them buying.
So people with homes they can’t personally live in anymore have to do something. The “selling the house and moving on” thing isn’t working for most due to an uncooperative real estate market. Some are letting their houses go back to the bank via the foreclosure route. It’s not a great option in terms of stress and credit damage, but it does solve the problem. Others are going the rental and rent-to-sell route to fill their homes. Some might argue that this is more stressful than the foreclosure route!
But why is it stressful? It boils down to one thing- the tenant. If you get a great tenant, they pay on time, care for your home, and don’t bother you. If you get a bad tenant, you never get paid on-time, enjoy a myriad of excuses for this non-payment, wind up in costly eviction proceedings, and are rewarded with a busted-up house at the end.
So how do you get a great tenant? Let’s define a great tenant first. They:
1. Pay on time and in full every month
2. Respect the home (aka like keeping it clean and undamaged)
3. Get along with the neighbors, the HOA, and you!
To get someone like this, there are 3 steps to follow:
1. Gather information: Order credit and criminal background checks, verify income and employment (request copies of the tenant’s last two paystubs and call the employer), and call the tenant’s past two landlords. You’ll want to ask the prospective tenant, employer, and past landlords as many questions as it takes to get a comfort level of what type of person wants to rent your home:
a. “Mr. Prospective Tenant, it is a pleasure to speak to you again! I never tire of your hilarious tales of amazing coincidences, which seem to be your hallmark. The honeymoon beach story with your two ex-wives somehow being on the same beach as you and your soon-to-be third ex-wife? Priceless! Now, why didn’t you pay your light bill in 2008? Why is there a collection account with Macy’s? What would your last landlord say about you?”
b. “Mr. Employer, if I may humbly ask, is Mr. X’s employment part-time, full-time, or contract work? How long has he been working there? Is he in good standing?”
c. “Mr. Landlord, your azure eyes must have been killing the ladies for years! At a risk of wasting your precious time with my inquiries that are so well beneath you, would you rent to this tenant again? Why or why not? How many times have they paid late? What did the house look like when they moved out? Is your superior intelligence a product of extensive domestic schooling, a plethora of renowned international boarding schools, or ‘Good Will Hunting’-like genetics?”
2. Analyze the data collected. Does the prospective tenant have stable employment? Do they make enough money to afford the rent and their other expenses realistically? What about if there is a slight bump, like a big car repair- can they still afford the home? Do they pay other people they commit to pay? What did their last landlord think of them? Would I feel unsafe renting to them if I had to give them bad news? Am I being overly optimistic about their merits or am I making a solid business decision?
3. Make the call. If they pass the smell test, approve them and move forward. If your gut is telling you to pass on their application, then pass! There is more than one fish in the sea.
There are many great tenants out there! Get a lot of data on the applicant, analyze it objectively, and make the decision on whether to approve them. It will work out most of the time!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Monthly: Incentives: Knowing Why the Chicken Crossed the Road & Why Fees are Good
Q. Why did the chicken cross the road?
A. There was bird feed there
B. A coyote was chasing him
C. He saw a hot “chick” on the median
D. To get to the other side
Answer D is the response that makes this a legendary “joke” (somehow…). Answer D is also very incomplete. Everything happens for a reason; no one does things without some type of incentive being involved. I mean, the chicken wouldn’t care about getting to the other side if he didn’t have a reason to do so. What was its motivation? What was the incentive the chicken was pursuing? A, B, or C answers make much more sense to me in answering the “why” question! They address the chicken’s needs:
A. Hunger
B. Safety
C. Love (or lust)
In business, incentives usually mean money. If 90%+ of businesses fail for lack of cash flow (lack of money incentives), then the ones that survive make sure they are getting enough cash incentives from their customers. Obviously, this isn’t a one way street; the businesses are offering enough value in return so these payments are a win-win deal.
So now that is established, what can incentives tell you about a company? Some charge for certain services, some don’t. Why not just take the free services when they’re offered? Cheaper, especially in tough economies, seems like the best way to go. Right?
Well, incentives can be telling; company pricing and their fees can tell you what they believe they do well and what they don’t. So, in terms of getting great results, paying fees can be very important! Fees motivate companies to do what you want them to do.
Reading into incentives (aka company pricing) is interesting and generally informative. Let’s look at examples of this from real estate and other businesses:
1. When a tech company sells pricy software and then offers free support with it, I’d expect the software to be good and the support to have long hold times. If support costs extra money monthly and can be cancelled at any time, the support will probably be pretty good.
2. If you ask a friend to pet sit Fluffy as a free favor to you, your friend will probably be late and leave early; unfortunately, most friends will do the minimum required! If you hire the most expensive pet sitter in town, chances are Fluffy will be treated like Benji on a movie set.
3. If property management companies don’t charge you to sell homes under management, they are probably not going to actively seek to sell your home to the tenant.
4. If you offer your real estate agent 7% commission, they will probably be incented to work harder to sell your home. Many people will try to get their agent down to 5%, which is a complete misread of how incentives work.
5. If a property management company charges a huge sign-up fee, but very little for procuring a tenant and managing the property, chances are they will be very motivated to sign you up. They may be less motivated to procure the tenant and manage the property.
Generally-speaking, incentives (pricing) are an effective measure of the value that will be received for different services. A $5 chocolate bar should be better than a $1 bar. If you offer to pay one friend $50 to mow your loan and ask another to do it for free, guess which one you will see firing up his push mower first in your front yard?
So fees are good for consumers! If you don’t make sure you are utilizing proper incentives for service providers, you’ll never know when (or if) the chicken will actually cross the road.
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Monthly: Should I Even Bother to Try to Sell My House in this Market?
This is a question that I was posed on a call last week. For property managers, this is a no-brainer, right? It’s like any buying question to a salesperson in any industry:
Question from prospective client:
Do I need a haircut?
Barber:
Absolutely.
Question from prospective client:
Do I need insurance coverage for (fill in the blank)?
Answer from insurance agent:
Absolutely. If your family’s (fill in the blank) is important, it would potentially be devastating to live without it.
Question from potential client:
Can my house sell in this market? It didn’t with the past 2 real estate agents I used.
Answer from real estate agent (straight faced without blinking):
Absolutely! My team has a 10-point marketing plan that can sell any house in any market*!
* With a nominal 50% price reduction
So back to the original question:
Should someone even bother to try to sell their house in this market?
My answer:
It depends.
Depends on what?
You should try to sell your home if you:
1. Are living in the house and don’t have to move
2. Have a clean tenant who is amenable to showings
3. Have a unique house (be honest!) that is desirable in any market
4. Are able to afford to price the house competitively (aka on the low end)
5. Are willing to gamble and eat the rent every month and wait for a buyer who might or might not come
My answer to not bother putting the house on the market for sale is under the following conditions:
1. There are several foreclosures and short sales active in your home’s subdivision
2. You can’t afford to or don’t want to drastically discount your home price
3. The home is vacant and #3, #4, and/or #5 above don’t apply to you
4. Neighbors’ homes that are priced around the level you want to sell yours for are sitting
The simple truth is that the buy & sell real estate market is continuing on a sharp downtrend with no end in sight, while the rental market is on a sharp uptrend. Everyone still needs a place to live, but the banks are not willing to lend to less than perfect borrowers. This leads to a surplus of rental and rent-to-own tenants, and a dearth of buyers. So the question is if it is better to go fishing at the small pond stocked with thousands of fish or the big pond with 25?
Whether it still makes sense to list your home for sale really depends on your answers to the questions above. Truthfully, for most people, the best financial option is to stay put in their home. But going straight to the rental or rent-to-sell market is best for people who are:
1. In a time crunch
2. Need to move
3. Can’t or don’t want to afford 2 mortgage payments
Often, it just doesn’t make sense to put the home on the market for sale. It’s an exercise in futility and costs a good deal of money. It’s like asking out the head cheerleader to the prom when you know you are going to wind up going with Suzy next door anyway. You might as well cut to the chase and save yourself the time, expense, and effort.
That being said, one size never fits all. Determine what criteria above fit your situation and act accordingly!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Monthly: Multiple Rental Offer Situations: Is Engagement The Same As Marriage?
So you’re walking down the street the day after successfully proposing marriage to your girlfriend, who now (you’ve been told) is to be referred as your “fiancée”. You’re happy and are convinced she was meant to be “The One”. But, wait; is that the beautiful Sasha Blue across the street? The girl of your dreams who always had those model boyfriends that put you permanently into the “friend” category? Is she looking at you? I think she is!
As you get closer, Miss Blue excitedly runs up to you. “Max, is that you? I was hoping to run into you! I finally got rid of that no-good Antonio! Wow… Is this the first time we are both single at the same time? How exciting! I’d love to catch up!”
As your heart races, your memory of getting down on one knee the night before is fading fast. Is it too late to run a reverse and go after Miss Blue? Engagement isn’t legally binding, is it? It’s a very interesting conundrum!
That is the same question that faces property management companies when multiple tenants apply for the same property at different times. At what engagement point prior to move-in is a tenant “locked” in and the property manager must forsake all other suitors?
Let’s look at a potential scenario: Tenant A applies for a property and is approved. They have not put a deposit down on the property yet. Tenant B sees the property the next day and loves it. They are a stronger applicant and are willing to pay more money per month. However, when talking with Tenant B, Tenant A puts down the deposit. Company policy is that whoever puts down the deposit first with an approved application gets the house. So, is Tenant B out of luck?
In most scenarios, yes. But there is a caveat. The property manager works for the owner. It is their job to get the best applicant that fits the home owner’s (aka their client’s) goals. Should the overall mandate to pursue what’s best for the owner trump company policy?
The easy answer is “of course!” The practical answer is yes and no- the solid, business school “it depends” response. On one hand, I don’t think it is reasonable to take a deposit from an approved tenant, keep the house on the market at a higher rate, and then renege on the agreement if another tenant appears that is willing to pay more. That could leave an applicant who dealt with the property management in good faith potentially homeless and dealing with the hassle of changing addresses, utilities, moving vans, and losing their piece of mind. This generates hate mail (rightfully so).
But, on the other hand, at what point is it reasonable to accept competing offers?
I believe that up until the tenant is told definitively that the home is theirs is a reasonable time to protect the owner’s interests. That may mean that if multiple applications come in (and even after deposits are put down), there is still time to review the applicants and decide which one is best for the owner. If the applicants are similar, then the first one who applied and put down a deposit should be given first dibs.
However, what about if the following applicant situations present themselves?
1. An applicant with a 600 credit score with average landlord history is approved and puts down a deposit before a 700 credit score applicant with great landlord history
2. 2 applicants are equal but one is willing to pay a higher monthly rent
3. 2 applicants are equal but one is willing to pay the year of rent upfront
4. One applicant is willing to move-in 3 weeks prior to the other
In these situations (if prior to giving “official” notice that the house is locked in for a certain tenant), then it is really imperative to choose the tenant that offers the best deal for the owner.
However, once official notice is given, I don’t believe it is ethical to offer the home to anyone else, regardless of the deal offered. The only way to supersede this is if the one tenant “buys out” the other in a separate negotiation. Money can make things happen!
So, if you asked to marry your fiancée, told her she was definitely “The One”, and gave her a ring, Miss Blue should be off limits. It may not be legally binding, but it’s the right thing to do.
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Is “Final Tenant Approval” Desirable For Landlords?
As I was thinking about this question the other day, I had a flashback to my high school history class. The first thing I learned from this trip down memory lane was that it is indeed possible to daydream about hours of daydreaming.
The second thing I learned was the strange applicability of our class’s discussion on democracy in regards to approving prospective tenant applications. The question was whether a true democracy (everyone makes the decisions) or a representative democracy (“experts” were voted in to make the decisions) was better.
The effectiveness of a true democracy was illustrated by a story that Aristotle told. It goes something like this:
You’re on a big cruise ship with 100 other passengers. Everything is going fine until it is clear a major storm is on the horizon. The ship is about to navigate a tight channel where it could easily be dashed upon the rocks if steered incorrectly. Any wrong move would spell imminent disaster for all the passengers. What to do?
A true democracy would offer a vote to everyone on the ship to determine which way to steer the rudder (“Raise your hand if you think we should steer right. Okay, after the final count of hands, the ‘Lefts’ have it.”). Aristotle said he’d prefer to rely on the captain and his crew to make that decision. This discourse lead to our founding fathers (many years later) settling on a representative democracy as America’s form of government; a true democracy sounds better, but wouldn’t work as well in practice. The captain, due to his experience and expertise, would know best.
Tenant selection is one of the most important duties a property manager performs for landlords. Tenants make or break (unfortunately, literally sometimes) a rental property. They will pay and treat the property well, or they won’t. Knowing who they are as people and their background greatly mitigates this risk. This is why the front end tenant screening by a property manager is so vital. And experience in tenant selection counts!
Some landlords want to be hands-on in this process. I don’t have an issue to this prior to going to market. But if the hands-on treatment is expected to go on for the duration of the tenant selection process, there is little need for a property manager. I would recommend posting a few rental ads and going the “do-it-yourself” route. This works for some people. It also (potentially) saves money, but greatly increases the risk.
It reminds me of my favorite all-time television show, 24. Kiefer Sutherland (Jack) would only try to bandage people with life-threatening injuries in the field if it was an absolute emergency. Most of the time he would just send them to CTU’s medical clinic for treatment. And, at no point did he ask Chloe (from CTU’s IT staff) to give him pointers on bandaging the wound. He trusted the professionals.
And so should landlords. “Final tenant approval” can be used as a cop-out by property managers. If things go south with a tenant, “final tenant approval” makes it very easy for the property manager to say, “Well, you gave final approval for the tenant we placed, so what happened isn’t really my fault.” I even sometimes see property management companies advertise this “feature”, making it appear to be desirable! All I can say is that if my sister died on the operating table and the doctor came to me and said, “You know, I asked you for “final removal approval” on which part of her organ to cut out… you said ‘OK’…” I would be incredulous! I mean, what do I know about medical procedures? Why would he ask me what to do? I’m paying for his expertise!
True democracy may sound good, but a representative democracy works much better in practice. Let the “final tenant approval” come from the expert you hired!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Too Many Repair Requests? 5 Methods To Stop The (Cash Flow) Bloodshed
As a property management company, we work to maximize the cash flow of our clients. Period. We don’t have a problem admitting that.
Sometimes things break in rental homes and that decreases the cash flow our clients receive. They don’t like it, and we don’t either. However, it is part of the game (pardon my street talk), so it is a necessary expense. Sometimes.
Normally if a repair policy is explained to tenants properly at the lease signing, there aren’t any problems. The landlord is responsible for operational issues; that is, if there isn’t any evidence of negligence by the tenant (if there is, the “Sorry if you smashed your toilet because your girlfriend dumped you for being volatile, but the bill goes to you…” message is sent). Then the easy stuff (changing light bulbs, air filters, etc.) is taken care of by the tenant. It’s simple stuff and everyone gets along grandly.
If the home is on the newer side and maintained, there just aren’t that many maintenance calls. Most people want their homes to operate properly (“hey, it’s nice to have the dryer dry clothes in less than 3 hours, so maybe I’ll clean the lint filter occasionally”), so they do the small things to keep it that way.
However, there are some tenants that seem to discover an awful lot of problems that they want the owner to fix. And when they are compared to other tenants, their identity becomes painfully obvious. The calls and the e-mails of their problems continue month-after-month. It gets to the point that everyone involved with managing the property has the tenant’s contact information memorized (“Oh, 704-xxx-xxxx? Mrs. X must be calling from work today.”) Sometimes, the repair requests are a string of bad luck and legitimate; often the tenant is trying to take advantage of the landlord’s altruism and is under the impression they don’t have to lift a finger because someone else will take care of them.
Repairs really hurt cash flow. But if the repairs aren’t done, unhappy tenants also hurt cash flow by trying to use their seemingly one point of leverage (holding back rent) to get what they want done. So what to do?
Before getting to some techniques to ward off unwarranted repair requests, I want to first iterate that almost all tenants (that I’ve worked with, at least) are reasonable with their repair requests. Most have busy lives and can’t be bothered will illegitimate claims. It’s not a huge problem on a whole. I find that doing the repairs that are requested builds trust and keeps everything running smoothly. So requested repairs should usually be done.
For the tenants that abuse the repair system, here are the top techniques to stop the illegitimate request flow:
1. Recalibrate expectations on repairs: Before the next repair is done, a meeting should be set with all principals on the lease. The purpose of the meeting (or call) is to reexamine the lease and go over exactly what is covered by the landlord and what is not. Also, it is probably time to schedule a walk-through of the house to make sure the maintenance agreement is being followed.
2. Alert the repair vendors that fraud is suspected: Vendors who visit the home should be put on alert. They can provide information about what claims are legitimate. If a claim is due to non-compliance with the maintenance agreement or rough play, the tenant needs to be billed for the issue, not the landlord!
3. Push back: If it was your house, what would you be calling a repairman fix, and what would you be doing yourself? That question is a good start to figuring out what repairs may be unnecessary for the landlord to cover.
4. Keep at code: The landlord is responsible, by law, to keep the rental home at building code. Nothing more. What is being requested beyond that?
5. Relocation: Maybe it’s worth asking the tenants if they would be more comfortable in someone else’s home?
Though this issue isn’t overly common, it can be uncommonly expensive and will continually siphon cash flow. If you find yourself signing over the monthly rent to the handyman month-after-month, it may be time to try something new!
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Recruiting Great Tenants- Your Team Is Only As Good As Your Players
It’s been said the most important part of major college coaching is recruiting. A team’s ultimate potential is limited by their talent level. Sure, good coaching can make good players better, but great players are the reason teams win championships and are consistently good.
I started thinking about this the other day when a friend of mine called. He told me that a friend of his bought a property management company inCharlotteand it is proving to be a nightmare. The company he bought has sloppy books, awful employees, and a large cache of substandard properties that are in disrepair. But most importantly, they have a lot of tenants that have not been paying rent and have stayed in the houses rent-free for months. His friend is watching his investment go up in flames as he tries to salvage what’s left.
This made me think. What would be the characteristic that would be most important to measure the strength of a property management company? Is it good employees, growing cash flow, long-term contracts in place, sound business procedures, or something else? They are all obviously very important. But what’s the ultimate key to success?
As I thought more about it, my head began to hurt and my mind drifted to sports:
Why did Coach Nick Nolte agree to buy Ricky a new truck in the movie, Blue Chips? Why are there so many recruiting scandals in college athletics? Why do I read about “tampering” charges in the professional leagues when teams illegally contact players when they are not allowed? Why are college coaches only allowed to send potential recruits a limited number of text messages and are restricted on how often they can call them? Why do coaches work harder in the offseason traveling to visit recruits than they do during the season? Why do the Charlotte Bobcats think they can rebuild the team with late round draft picks?
Then the answer occurred to me. The players are the most important thing. They directly dictate the success of a coach. If a team has great players, they will be a good team (no matter the coaching quality). That is why recruiting is so important and organizations are willing to push the envelope on wooing potential stars.
As a rule, every top-tier athletic team puts a premium on signing great players. And this is the same mentality that top-tier landlords and property managers, like you, must have to build a strong property management company and investment portfolio. It’s about getting great tenants for your properties. They will directly dictate your success.
When a great tenant applies for a property, it is imperative to let them know that you want them. You need them. You will treat them like gold if they would just sign with you (on the lease). Text and call them every hour (there are no contact restrictions in business, only the weirdness factor of over-communication). Add incentives. Buy them the pony they always wanted, as long as it is munching the grass in your rental home’s yard! Let them know your love will never end if they can out down a deposit today.
Great tenants provide so many great benefits! They pay on-time and in full providing consistent cash flow. They take care of the properties so they don’t fall into neglect. They let you know if your employees are lacking or slacking. They even take care of minor repairs on their own!
Your team, investment, and/or company is only as strong as the players it has signed. Maniacally pursue the best, get them under contract, and rest will take care of itself!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Rental Home Walk-Throughs: 4 Ways to Protect Yourself
“You know you have a good compromise when both sides are slightly unhappy.” (Many Authors Credited)
As a Charlotte property manager, my least favorite part of the job are the end-of-lease walk-throughs; that is, when the tenant moves out, and we visit the property to check out its condition. If there are damages, we need to decide whether they are “normal wear and tear” (no charge to the tenant) or damages that need to be repaired from the tenant funds. It’s very subjective.
There are three scenarios when it comes to these property manager walk-throughs. The house is left in:
1. Great condition: The tenant gets their security deposit back and the owner doesn’t have to pay much to get the home in market shape. Everyone is happy.
2. Mediocre Condition: Some of the damage is normal wear and tear, and some of it was caused by too much rough play by the tenant. This is where the greatest conflicts occur between owner and tenant.
3. Poor Condition: The security deposit is basically conceded by the tenant. They know they don’t deserve anything back and hope that there is no future contact concerning the property. The owner is able to use the security deposit to mitigate repair costs.
I’m going to focus on the most challenging situation, the home left in “mediocre condition”. This can elicit two different responses from the same walk-through report:
Owner: “You’re killing me! That tenant treated my home like a kid’s tree house and they are only being charged $500 for damages? Add a zero please! They should be put in jail! Did they ever think to cover the food in microwave so it didn’t erupt all inside of it? Did they decide to save money on towels and wipe their hands on the walls? The carpet was new when they moved in! You’re being easy on them! You represent me, remember? Why do you like them so much?”
Tenant: “You’re killing me! I treated that home like my own! I cleaned it daily. We took our shoes off when we were inside (which we shouldn’t have even bothered with, being that the carpet was shoddy-looking when we moved in- I told you this!! Remember??) There might have been a couple things wrong, but I could have fixed them for like $50! $500? Are you crazy?? I thought you liked me! This is highway robbery! You’ll be hearing from my attorney!”
Property managers are really trying to do the right thing, but are stuck in the middle of competing interests. It’s sort of like being friends with both the wife and the husband when they are in the midst of a divorce. You want to be friends with both (like usual), without either of them feeling slighted. Practically-speaking, that can be tough to do!
To make this experience as clean and easy as possible, I’d offer the following four suggestions to landlords:
1. Trust your instincts- there is no “right” answer and it is usually impossible to make both parties entirely happy
2. Be specific on damages and document repair costs
3. Have a consistent methodology on how costs are assessed
4. Take pictures or use video during the walk-through so tenants can see the damages they are being charged for
Though rental home walk-throughs can’t always be pain-free, there are ways to limit potential fall-out from this necessary part of the property management business.
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: When Should Rental Rates be Negotiated?
As a Charlotte-area property manager, we get contacted (usually via e-mail) by prospective tenants asking us if the owner is willing to accept less than the listed rental rate. This question gets asked before the tenant even looks at the rental home.
I guess with the “new normal”, Group-On world we are living in, some might assume that consumers are not willing to look at something that isn’t drastically reduced; I don’t necessarily agree with this. But it does bring up the question: How does a property manager answer such a query on an immediate price reduction? There are obviously two ways to do this.
Question from Prospective Tenant: Will you lower the price even though I haven’t even seen the home and have done nothing besides click the rental ad to e-mail you?
Answer from Property Manager: Yes! How much would you prefer to pay? The list price is merely a starting point for negotiations, my astute friend! Property management’s new business model is akin to the “suggested donation” for entrance into a benefit concert. By the way, all the new chairs in our office are of the “EZ-Fold” style; we sit on them while eating our Burger King “Have It Your Way” Whopper, Jrs.
OR
Answer from Property Manager: No! The listing price is the listing price! I’m offended by your audaciousness, you crooked wretch! In a battle of wills, we will win. Think about it: our downside is that the rental home is on the market for a few more days; your downside is homelessness. The rent has now doubled for you! Scram!
Neither of these is a winning response (caution: do not use these responses at home or the office), but they do cover each end of the spectrum of responses to this “negotiation.” The best answer is somewhere in the middle of this spectrum. But where?
First of all, let’s clarify what a “negotiation” is. A true negotiation is where both sides give something of value and, in turn, receive something in return. In this example, the property manager is giving a discount in rent (real dollars), and the tenant has not even committed to visiting the property (let alone filling out an application and putting down a deposit)!
This example is not a negotiation; it is an example of a fishing expedition. Or a game show called, “How Desperate is the Owner to Rent Out their Property?” So giving away rent money for nothing is an obvious no-go. The best answer to an immediate query about reducing the rent would be something along the lines of, “I’m not sure how the owners would feel about that. If you visit the property and are interested, it is certainly something I could ask them.”
Okay, this does risk alienating some people. However, if the rental price is close to market value, then other renters will materialize. However, if the house has been on the market for a while, this may be a game you want to play. Proceed cautiously so you don’t wind up throwing free lawn care and daily Bojangles biscuits in as well to close the deal.
What about if the tenants do look at the property, are interested, and then try to negotiate the rental price? If the owner is willing to reduce the rent, I think an argument could be made to do this; however, this would be only if the tenants are strong candidates (great credit scores, landlord history, and income). Tenants who pay on time, keep the property in good shape, and do not create problems for others (neighbors, police, and property managers…) are worth their weight in gold. If they do not fit this bill, I would decline any reduction in rent.
Rental rate negotiation may be subjective, but common negotiation rules still apply. Make sure you get when you give! No “quid” without “quo”!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn MoreCharlotte Property Management Weekly: Property Management Owner’s Dilemma: Get Bigger, Stay the Same, or Sell Out?
Business is a funny thing; one is never allowed to be satisfied. If you start a company, grow it, and begin to cash flow it, then that’s good, right? Isn’t that the idea? I thought it was, at least.
However, it really isn’t if you read the news, watch television, or attend any business group meetings. The things that people want to talk about are:
1. What are your growth figures in terms of revenue? Projected out to 2015?
2. Is your social media and digital strategy sound? Have you made the time and financial investments?
3. Have you thought about geographical expansion? Franchise? Office openings?
And on and on and on. There apparently isn’t any downtime allowed! If you sit pat, you’re destined to fail. You must reach for the stars of worldwide domination! The purpose of making money is to reinvest it! Get on it! Get bigger! Now!
So rapid growth is left as the only option, unless you want to be considered a “burned-out” property manager. If you choose to pursue slower, organic growth, you can be called “uninspired”, a “non-visionary”, and lazy. No one writes articles on business people who stay the course! Those stories got chopped out early in the editing room. But despite many loud naysayers to the contrary, staying the same is certainly a very viable option. It’s just the “keeping on, keeping on” strategy. Nothing is wrong with that!
But what about if you really are “uninspired” now? You are burned out! You are a property management company owner (or real estate agent) who doesn’t want to deal with the business anymore. You are looking to get out and sell out. How would you do this?
You could hire a business broker to find someone who wants to add property management to their real estate brokerage company, or just wants to own a stand-alone property management company. These instances are pretty rare and the business broker would truly be earning their money if they found someone who will buy your smaller firm (under $1M in revenues)!
What is more likely is that you would sell your management accounts to another property management firm. For example, I received a letter the other day from one of the largest property managers in town; this letter was undoubtedly sent to every property management company in the area. The letter asked to buy up the property management accounts we had.
In mergers & acquisitions speak, they were utilizing a typical roll-up strategy of buying up every smaller company in the area to accelerate their growth. They had no interest in our systems or procedures; they just wanted to throw our management clients into their management machine. This would be a fast way for them to grow rapidly. It also would be a quick way for “uninspired” property managers to get out of the business and make some quick money off of their company. A true win-win? Possibly!
To grow, stay, or go- it’s a personal decision that shouldn’t be the result of other’s expectations. There are options available no matter what you and your company’s strategy is!
Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)
Learn More